• Bob Muenchen's avatarr4stats.com

    [Since this was originally published in 2013, I’ve collected new data that renders this article obsolete. You can always see the most recent data here. -Bob Muenchen]

    Learning to use a data analysis tool well takes significant effort, so people tend to continue using the tool they learned in college for much of their careers. As a result, the software used by professors and their students is likely to predict what the next generation of analysts will use for years to come. I track this trend, and many others, in my article The Popularity of Data Analysis Software. In the latest update (4/13/2012) I forecast that, if current trends continued, the use of the R software would exceed that of SAS for scholarly applications in 2015. That was based on the data shown in Figure 7a, which I repeat here:

    Let’s take a more detailed look at what…

    View original post 1,093 more words

  • For the last nine years I’ve gone on a golfing trip to Vermont with my dad.  After the first year we started a competition complete with plaque and names engraved for the champions.  Here are the rules.  We play 7 rounds over the course of 4 days and you take your lowest score on each hole from any of the rounds and fill out one score card.  Whoever has the lowest “master card” wins.  (Ties are broken by looking at who had the lower score on the highest handicapped hole, second highest handicapped hole, etc.)

    Currently, the series is 5-2 in favor of the dad.  Here is a plot of what this competition looks like when I’m playing well.  I’m the orange line and my dad is the green line.  This is from 2013 when my father started off very, very slowly.  Through 3 rounds we were tied, and then I took and held the lead at the end of the 4th round and held the lead through the middle of the 6th round when my dad went bonkers and made a bunch of birdies and picked up pars on holes he hadn’t gotten yet.  So what does it look like when someone is getting crushed in this competition?

    LakeMorey

    After two full rounds, my father is 10 full strokes ahead of me.  It’s an absolute blow out through 2 rounds.  That black dot is a birdie, which pops made on the 18th hole of the second round today.  An early dagger.  Though I have plenty of holes that are currently sitting at double bogey, so I should make up ground fairly quickly (hopefully, anyway).  I’ll update this tomorrow after we’ve completed our rounds.

    LakeMorey2015

    Cheers.

    Update: Through three rounds: I’m down 75-81.

    LakeMorey2015

    Update 2: Through 4 rounds I’m down 75-78 (and I do not have the tie breaker).

    LakeMorey2015

  • Thanks to everyone who came to see the show!  For those of you who missed it, I’ll be at Estate Ultra Bar at 1177 N Elston Ave on August 6th!

     IMG_20150627_155618671 IMG_20150627_155627207 IMG_20150627_155630762 IMG_20150627_155642854 IMG_20150627_155651042 IMG_20150627_155658088 IMG_20150627_155710420 IMG_20150627_155730521 IMG_20150627_155746778_HDR IMG_20150627_170244530

  • Cathy O'Neil, mathbabe's avatarmathbabe

    Lately you’ve seen a string of articles about how women say sorry too much. We’ve got yesterday’s New York Times opinion piece entitled Why Women Apologize and Should Stop, we’ve got Amy Schumer’s amazing-as-always skit on accomplished women apologizing for everything including existing, and even academics are weighing in.

    This is not my problem. I don’t apologize as an automatic response. I learned that early on, when I got my first teaching evaluation; I had apologized exactly once to my (all female) class about not being prepared, in a summer semester where I met with them daily for 10 weeks, and at the end of the summer they all mentioned that I came to class unprepared. I had never come unprepared a second time, nor had I ever mentioned being unprepared a second time. That experience cured me of apologies more generally.

    But I remain curious about how men…

    View original post 778 more words

  • Michael Lugo's avatarGod plays dice

    Apparently students in the UK have been protesting against the following question on a GCSE math exam (see e. g. coverage at The Guardian):


    There are n sweets in a bag. Six of the sweets are orange. The rest of the sweets are yellow. Hannah takes a random sweet from the bag. She eats the sweet. Hannah then takes at random another sweet from the bag. She eats the sweet. The probability that Hannah eats two orange sweets is 1/3. Show that n²-n-90=0.

    The probability that the first sweet is orange is $latex 6/n$. Now there are five orange sweets left out of $latex n-1$, so the probability that the second sweet is orange, assuming that the first one is, is $latex 5/(n-1)$. Therefore we need to solve $latex (6/n) times (5/(n-1)) = 1/3$. Multiplying it out gives

    $latex {30 over n(n-1)} = {1 over 3}$

    and we can…

    View original post 455 more words

  • Michael Lugo's avatarGod plays dice

    Do you like geometrical constructions? Then you should like theflag of Nepal, which is the only non-rectangular flag of a nation, is actually defined bya Euclidean ruler and compass constructionin their constitution. See astep by step drawing of the constructionorthis video from Numberphile.

    The flag of the state of Ohiois also non-rectangular, but sadly their laws only describe it as “burgee-shaped”. It might be possible to extract a construction fromthe picture in this brochure from the Ohio secretary of state, but it looks like many of the points are specified but their position in a larger rectangle. Ohio’s flag is analytic geometry; Nepal’s is synthetic.

    View original post

  • In an awesome turn of events, signs with rap lyrics are turning up all over Atlanta
  • Here is an email I received from “Ted Wells, Esq.” (It’s not really from Ted Wells, and the only reason I want to make that clear is because I’m scared the all-powerful Roger Goodell will levy and arbitrarily harsh punishment.)

    Dear Greg,

    Please help me calculate a probability.  I have been asked to investigate whether Tom Brady and the New England Patriots have conspired to break the rules by using under inflated footballs.  This allegation was made by two different opponents in 2014 and has roots going back over 10 years according to AJ Feely, who allegedly played in the NFL.  Some background data for the probability I need you to calculate:  Based on data provided by Rotowire, Tom has handled 3399 snaps over the past 3 years, an average of almost 71 per game.  If we extrapolate from this to his entire career of 238 games including playoffs, he has handled approximately 16,898 snaps during NFL games.  And before every offensive snap the football is handled by a linesman, an NFL official, who places the ball on the line of scrimmage.

    So here is what I need you to calculate:  What is the probability that the Patriots have been using under inflated footballs for an extended period of time, perhaps over a decade, perhaps almost 17,000 offensive snaps, when there have been zero – ZERO – instances in which a game official who handles both team’s footballs over 140 times per game noticed that a Patriots ball might be too soft?  I have also asked Warren Sharp to calculate this for me, but he currently is preoccupied trying to get a gob of peanut butter off the roof of his mouth.

    Sincerely,

    Ted Wells, Esq.

  • Great unicorn picture

    statsbylopez's avatarStatsbyLopez

    Screen Shot 2015-05-20 at 12.40.25 PM

    On February 20, the National Hockey League announced a partnership with software company SAP. The alliance’s primary purpose was to bring a new enhanced stats section to NHL.com, built in the shadows of popular analytics sites like war-on-ice and the now dormant extra-skater.

    It was, it seemed, a partial admission from the league that it’s best metrics were hosted elsewhere.

    “The stats landscape in the NHL is kind of all over the place,” suggested Chris Foster, Director of the NHL’s Digital Business Development, at the time. “One of the goals is to make sure that all of the tools that fans need are on NHL.com.”

    One tool presented in February was SAP’s Matchup Analysis, designed to predict the league’s postseason play. The tool claimed 85% accuracy, which Yahoo’s Puck Daddy boasted was good enough to make “TV executives nervous and sports [bettors] rather happy.”

    There’s just one problem.

    85%…

    View original post 779 more words

  • From this article:

    “What do gangs fight about?” Waco police spokesman Sgt. W. Patrick Swanton told theMorning News. “Gang stuff. Who’s the baddest gang around. Stupid stuff.