Open peer discussion: An alternative to closed peer review by Peter Hoff, University of Washington

+1

Ā Journals and their alternatives

Our current journal publication system has traditionally served two purposes: dissemination and peer review. Regarding dissemination, the journal system arguably does a good job with some things (special issues, discussion pieces, copy-editing), but does a poor job with others (open-access, time to publication, article updating). Happily, we have alternative ways of disseminating our research. For example, the arXiv provides an updatable, open-access article platform that appears publicly within days of article submission. Furthermore, posting an article on the arXiv does not preclude it from being published in a journal. In this way, the arXiv can be seen as a complement to the journal system, rather than just an alternative or replacement.

The standard argument against replacing the journal system with something like the arXiv has been that the journal system provides peer review. However, the journal peer review system is deficient in many ways and, unlikeā€¦

View original post 726 more words

Advertisements

Posted on September 2, 2015, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: