Blog Archives
NFL Picks – Week 3
Total – SU: 32-16-0 (66.67%) ATS: 27-20-1 (57.29% +5 Units) O/U: 31-17-0 (64.58% +12.3 Units)
Week 1 – SU: 10-6-0 ATS: 8-8-0 O/U: 13-3-0
Week 2 – SU: 10-6-0 ATS: 10-6-0 O/U: 10-6-0
Week 3 – SU: 12-4-0 ATS: 9-6-1 O/U: 8-8
Tampa Bay at Atlanta
Prediction: Falcons 24-20 (62.5%)
Pick: Buccaneers +6.5 (55.8%)
Total: Under 45
San Francisco at Arizona
Prediction: 49ers 22-20 (55.9%)
Pick: Cardinals +3 (52.7%)
Total: Under 42.5
San Diego at Buffalo
Prediction: Bills 23-22 (51.8%)
Pick: Chargers +2.5 (55.3%)
Total: Over 44.5
Tennessee at Cincinnati
Prediction: Bengals 24-19 (64.5%)
Pick: Titans +7 (55.1%)
Total: Under 43.5
Baltimore at Cleveland
Prediction: Ravens 22-21 (53.5%)
Pick: Browns +2 (52.2%) PUSH
Total: Over 42
Green Bay at Detroit
Prediction: Lions 25-24 (53.4%)
Pick: Lions -1 (50.5%)
Total: Under 52.5
Indianapolis at Jacksonville
Prediction: Colts 23-20 (57.4%)
Pick: Jaguars +7 (62.3%)
Total: Under 45.5
Kansas City at Miami
Prediction: Dolphins 21-19 (55.9%)
Pick: Chiefs +5 (58.2%)
Total: Under 41.5
Oakland at New England
Prediction: Patriots 29-19 (77.2%)
Pick: Raiders +14.5 (61.5%)
Total: Over 47
Minnesota at New Orleans
Prediction: Saints 27-20 (68.3%)
Pick: Vikings +9.5 (58.0%)
Total: Under 51
Houston at NY Giants
Prediction: Giants 22-21 (51.1%)
Pick: Giants +2.5 (58.2%)
Total: Over 42
Washington at Philadelphia
Prediction: Eagles 25-22 (59.8%)
Pick: Washington Football Team +6.5 (58.6%)
Total: Under 50
Denver at Seattle
Prediction: Seahawks 24-22 (54.6%)
Pick: Broncos +4.5 (58.2%)
Total: Under 49
Dallas at St. Louis
Prediction: Cowboys 23-22 (53.0%)
Pick: Rams +2 (52.7%)
Total: Under 45.5
Pittsburgh at Carolina
Prediction: Panthers 23-20 (59.4%)
Pick: Steelers +3.5 (50.5%)
Total: Over 41.5
Chicago at NY Jets
Prediction: Bears 21-20
Pick: Bears +2.5 (60.1%)
Total: Under 45.5
March Madness Projections Updated – March 5, 2013
Number 1 Seeds: Gonzaga, Indiana, Michigan, Duke
Last 4 in: Boise State, Wichita State, Virginia, Stanford
Last 4 out: California, La Salle, Arizona State, Baylor
From Deadspin: Nate Silver’s Braying Idiot Detractors Show That Being Ignorant About Politics Is Like Being Ignorant About Sports
This article by David Roher is fantastic: Nate Silver’s Braying Idiot Detractors Show That Being Ignorant About Politics Is Like Being Ignorant About Sports
The article also pointed me to the Princeton Election Consortium, which is also fantastic. They have the probability of an Obama win at 99.0% and predict an electoral college win of 315-223. Below are some of the graphs they have produced about the election, I especially like the 2012 Electoral College Map with each state’s area displayed proportional to its electoral votes.
Cheers.
Rule for Variance Inflation Factors
A quote from here:
“Goldberger (1991) notes that while the number of pages in econometrics
texts devoted to the problem of multi-collinearity in multiple regression is
large the same books have little to say about sample size. Goldberger states:
“Perhaps that imbalance is attributable to the lack of an exotic polysyllabic
name for ‘small sample size.’ If so, we can remove that impediment by introducing the term micronumerosity” (Goldberger, 1991: 248–249).”
Cheers.
NCAAB Rankings – 1/2/2012
Rankings as of 2:31pm on 1/2/2012. Sagarin ratings as of 1/1/2012. AP rankings as of 1/2/2012.
Previous rankings are here.
Pittsburgh, Oklahoma, and Miss St. fall out of the top 25 and New Mexico, North Carolina, and Purdue are in the top 25 this week. The Mountain West conference has 3 teams in my top 25. That is the same number as the ACC, Pac-12 and SEC COMBINED. I’ve even given the MWC there own color (purple). I considered giving them red since the Pac-12 wasn’t using it at all, but I think purple is a more fitting color for the MWC (think purple mountains majesty).
Breakdown by conference: 2, 6, 9, 4, 0, 1, 3
ACC Big East Big Ten Big 12 Pac 12 SEC MWC Other
Team | Rank | Change | Record | AP | Sagarin |
Syracuse | 1 | ↑1 | 15-0 | 1 | 1 |
Baylor | 2 | ↑2 | 13-0 | 4 | 6 |
Indiana | 3 | ↓2 | 13-1 | 12 | 4 |
Michigan St. | 4 | ↑5 | 13-2 | 10 | 8 |
Duke | 5 | ↑7 | 12-1 | 5 | 5 |
Ohio St. | 6 | ↓3 | 13-2 | 6 | 3 |
UConn | 7 | ↑10 | 12-1 | 8 | 26 |
Michigan | 8 | ↑8 | 12-2 | 16 | 41 |
Missouri | 9 | ↑4 | 13-0 | 7 | 11 |
Illinois | 10 | ↓3 | 12-3 | 11 | 47 |
Northwestern | 11 | ↓3 | 11-3 | – | 51 |
Marquette | 12 | ↓1 | 12-2 | 20 | 19 |
Wisconsin | 13 | ↓3 | 12-3 | 18 | 15 |
Georgetown | 14 | ↑11 | 12-1 | 9 | 10 |
Seton Hall | 15 | ↓1 | 12-2 | 38 | 28 |
UNLV | 16 | ↑3 | 15-2 | 17 | 12 |
Kansas State | 17 | ↓2 | 11-1 | 23 | 18 |
Purdue | 18 | NR | 12-3 | 33 | 27 |
Kentucky | 19 | ↑4 | 13-1 | 2 | 2 |
North Carolina | 20 | NR | 13-2 | 3 | 7 |
Minnesota | 21 | ↓16 | 12-3 | – | 50 |
Louisville | 22 | ↓16 | 12-2 | 11 | 13 |
San Diego St. | 23 | ↓5 | 12-2 | 24 | 38 |
Kansas | 24 | – | 10-3 | 14 | 9 |
New Mexico | 25 | NR | 12-2 | 34 | 31 |
BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.
Cheers.
Multidimensional Scaling, Republican Presidential Candidates, and “a douchebag”
If you don’t want to read this whole thing, just check out the graph: Multidimensional Scaling: Republican Candidates – 8/16/2011
I was having a conversation with some friends today and someone mentioned that Rick Perry might have problems in the election because there were rumors he was gay. So I went to google and typed in “Rick Perry is” and google kindly offered me the following auto-complete options: “gay”, “an idiot”, “a rino“, “evil”, “not a conservative”. This got me thinking how this compared with the other candidates google auto-completes. For instance, if you google “Mitt Romney is” you get suggestions like “a mormon” and ” an idiot” as well as three other suggestions. I did this for all of the major candidates (sorry Thaddeus) and recorded the five google auto-complete suggestions.
Then I created a vector for each candidate based on the google auto-complete words. Each candidate was an observation and each word was a variable. The candidate would get a 5 if the word was first on their list, a 4 if it was second, and so on with a 0 if the word was not mentioned in their auto-complete.
I then used multidimensional scaling (the cmdscale function in R) to allow me to visually display the relative positions of the candidates to each other. This all led to this graphic: Multidimensional Scaling: Republican Candidates – 8/16/2011. The location of the circles is based on multidimensional scaling, the size of the circle is relative to their standings in a national poll taken from fivethirtyeight.com, and the top five google auto-completes are displayed in or near the appropriate circle.
Some thoughts:
- Every single candidate has the term “an idiot” in either the first or second auto-complete term
- 3 candidates were listed as “hot” (Palin. Bachmann, and Romney)
- “stupid” was only used to describe women
- Perry and Santorum (who has a much bigger google problem that anything I’ve listed here) had “gay” listed in their autocpmpletes and Pawlenty had “definitely not gay”
- Bachman and Palins circles are nearly identical in size (11.7% ad 11.4%, respectively) and words (they share “an idiot”, “hot”, and “stupid”)
- “a douchebag” appears in auto-completes for Santorum, Gingrich, and Pawlenty. I imagine it will be hard to win with this word attached to your name. (John Kerry couldn’t do it.)
- The only overwhelmingly positive google auto-complete was for Herman Cain whose fifth auto-complete option was “awesome”