Blog Archives
NFL Predictions – Week 7
Overall Records for 2012
SU: 64-40
ATS: 57-47
O/U: 56-46
Week 7 (11-2 SU, 6-7 ATS, 6-7 O/U)
Week 6 (6-8 SU, 7-7 ATS, 6-7 O/U)
Week 5 (10-4 SU, 7-7 ATS, 7-7 O/U)
Week 4 (10-5 SU, 10-5 ATS, 12-2 O/U)
Week 3 (5-11 SU, 9-7 ATS, 9-7 O/U)
Week 2 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Week 1 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Week 7
Thursday @8:05pm
Seattle Seahawks at San Francisco 49ers
Prediction: 49ers win 28-20
Pick: 49ers -7.5
O/U: Over 37.5
Sunday @1pm
Tennessee Titans at Buffalo Bills
Prediction: Bills win 23-22
Pick: Titans +3.5
O/U: Under 45.5
Arizona Cardinals at Minnesota Vikings
Prediction: Vikings win 25-23
Pick: Cardinals +5.5
O/U: Over 40.5
Cleveland Browns at Indianapolis Colts
Prediction: Colts win 23-17
Pick: Colts -3
O/U: Under 44.5
Baltimore Ravens at Houston Texans
Prediction: Ravens win 26-24
Pick: Ravens +6.5
O/U: Over 48
Green Bay Packers at St. Louis Rams
Prediction: Packers win 30-17
Pick: Packers -5.5
O/U: Over 45
Dallas Cowboys at Carolina Panthers
Prediction: Cowboys win 25-21
Pick: Cowboys -2
O/U: Over 45.5
Washington Redskins at New York Giants
Prediction: Giants win 28-22
Pick: Redskins +6.5
O/U: Over 49.5
New Orleans Saints at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Prediction: Saints win 32-20
Pick: Saints -2.5
O/U: Over 49
Sunday @4:25pm
New York Jets at New England Patriots
Prediction: Patriots win 35-20
Pick: Patriots -10.5
O/U: Over 47
Sunday @4:25pm
Jacksonville Jaguars at Oakland Raiders
Prediction: Raiders win 21-16
Pick: Raiders -4
O/U: Under 43
Sunday @8:30pm
Pittsburgh Steelers at Cincinnati Bengals
Prediction: Steelers win 24-23
Pick: Bengals +2.5
O/U: Over 46
Monday @8:40pm
Detroit Lions at Chicago Bears
Prediction: Bears win 28-26
Pick: Lions +5.5
O/U: Over 47.5
Cheers.
Week 6 QB performances reviewed via RIPPEN
RIPPEN rankings for week 6 performances:
| Player | Team | RIPPEN | QB rating |
| Flacco, J. | BAL | 38.201 | 106.9 |
| Manning, P. | DEN | 34.475 | 129.0 |
| Rodgers, A. | GB | 33.463 | 133.8 |
| Freeman, J. | TB | 33.324 | 124.7 |
| Palmer, C. | OAK | 33.153 | 102.2 |
| Wilson, R. | SEA | 30.824 | 133.7 |
| Griffin, III, R. | WAS | 26.015 | 97.2 |
| Bradford, S. | STL | 25.218 | 91.3 |
| Roethlisberger, B. | PIT | 24.023 | 87.8 |
| Tannehill, R. | MIA | 21.243 | 112.0 |
| Romo, T. | DAL | 20.028 | 97.1 |
| Manning, E. | NYG | 20.927 | 87.4 |
| Weeden, B. | CLE | 18.161 | 92.7 |
| Brady, T. | NE | 16.272 | 79.3 |
| Ponder, C. | MIN | 15.649 | 83.2 |
| Schaub, M. | HOU | 14.815 | 56.6 |
| Dalton, A. | CIN | 14.458 | 87.3 |
| Stafford, M. | DET | 13.478 | 69.8 |
| Vick, M. | PHI | 13.471 | 77.4 |
| Ryan, M. | ATL | 11.480 | 59.4 |
| Fitzpatrick, R. | BUF | 11.166 | 68.9 |
| Hasselbeck, M. | TEN | 10.428 | 75.0 |
| Luck, A. | IND | 9.097 | 51.3 |
| Sanchez, M. | NYJ | 9.089 | 109.0 |
| Smith, A. | SF | 9.038 | 43.1 |
| Rivers, P. | SD | 5.959 | 54.2 |
| Kolb, K. | ARI | 5.757 | 64.3 |
| Quinn, B. | KC | 5.571 | 48.1 |
| Skelton, J. | ARI | 3.812 | 6.2 |
Season RIPPEN rankings through six weeks of games:
| Player | Team | RIPPEN | QB rating |
| Manning, P. | DEN | 27.304 | 105.0 |
| Griffin, III, R. | WAS | 27.279 | 100.5 |
| Brady, T. | NE | 26.905 | 97.2 |
| Newton, C. | CAR | 25.630 | 80.9 |
| Rodgers, A. | GB | 24.263 | 105.4 |
| Schaub, M. | HOU | 23.978 | 91.6 |
| Ryan, M. | ATL | 23.689 | 98.8 |
| Roethlisberger, B. | PIT | 20.393 | 99.9 |
| Rivers, P. | SD | 19.697 | 85.3 |
| Flacco, J. | BAL | 19.654 | 92.0 |
| Smith, A. | SF | 19.131 | 96.6 |
| Ponder, C. | MIN | 19.091 | 92.4 |
| Cutler, J. | CHI | 18.720 | 78.7 |
| Brees, D. | NO | 18.243 | 90.7 |
| Manning, E. | NYG | 17.664 | 94.9 |
| Palmer, C. | OAK | 16.843 | 88.7 |
| Dalton, A. | CIN | 16.770 | 91.7 |
| Romo, T. | DAL | 16.380 | 82.1 |
| Locker, J. | TEN | 16.245 | 90.2 |
| Stafford, M. | DET | 15.928 | 79.2 |
| Freeman, J. | TB | 15.780 | 84.2 |
| Tannehill, R. | MIA | 14.544 | 76.5 |
| Bradford, S. | STL | 13.065 | 81.3 |
| Vick, M. | PHI | 12.533 | 77.7 |
| Wilson, R. | SEA | 11.917 | 85.6 |
| Luck, A. | IND | 10.782 | 72.0 |
| Sanchez, M. | NYJ | 10.761 | 70.9 |
| Fitzpatrick, R. | BUF | 10.465 | 81.5 |
| Weeden, B. | CLE | 10.417 | 68.1 |
| Kolb, K. | ARI | 8.357 | 86.1 |
| Cassel, M. | KC | 6.678 | 66.2 |
| Hasselbeck, M. | TEN | 6.678 | 74.1 |
| Gabbert, B. | JAX | 6.678 | 73.3 |
Cheers.
NFL Rankings – 10/17/2012
StatsInTheWild NFL rankings as of October 17, 2012 at 12:34pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | ESPN | TeamRankings.com | SOS | Points Diff |
| Chicago | 1 | ↑1 | 4-1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | +78 |
| San Francisco | 2 | ↓1 | 4-2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | +58 |
| Atlanta | 3 | ↑4 | 6-0 | 1 | 2 | 25 | +58 |
| Houston | 4 | ↓1 | 5-1 | 2 | 4 | 21 | +58 |
| NY Giants | 5 | ↑7 | 4-2 | 3 | 3 | 17 | +64 |
| Arizona | 6 | ↓1 | 4-2 | 11 | 12 | 1 | +13 |
| Seattle | 7 | ↑2 | 4-2 | 9 | 5 | 5 | +17 |
| Minnesota | 8 | ↓4 | 4-2 | 10 | 11 | 7 | +29 |
| New England | 9 | ↓3 | 3-3 | 7 | 8 | 10 | +51 |
| Green Bay | 10 | ↑1 | 3-3 | 8 | 7 | 6 | +19 |
| Baltimore | 11 | ↓1 | 5-1 | 4 | 9 | 26 | +43 |
| St. Louis | 12 | ↓4 | 3-3 | 20 | 10 | 2 | -1 |
| Washington | 13 | ↑9 | 3-3 | 15 | 17 | 13 | +5 |
| Detroit | 14 | ↓1 | 2-3 | 19 | 19 | 4 | -11 |
| Miami | 15 | ↓1 | 3-3 | 17 | 14 | 16 | +3 |
| Denver | 16 | ↑2 | 3-3 | 12 | 13 | 31 | +32 |
| NY Jets | 17 | – | 3-3 | 23 | 18 | 12 | -8 |
| Dallas | 18 | ↓2 | 2-3 | 18 | 15 | 9 | -25 |
| Tampa Bay | 19 | ↑6 | 2-3 | 22 | 24 | 23 | +19 |
| Philadelphia | 20 | – | 3-3 | 13 | 20 | 11 | -22 |
| Cincinnati | 21 | ↓2 | 3-3 | 21 | 21 | 28 | -14 |
| Buffalo | 22 | ↑2 | 3-3 | 25 | 16 | 15 | -55 |
| San Diego | 23 | ↓2 | 3-3 | 16 | 27 | 32 | +11 |
| Pittsburgh | 24 | ↓1 | 2-3 | 14 | 23 | 27 | +1 |
| Carolina | 25 | ↑3 | 1-4 | 28 | 28 | 19 | -33 |
| New Orleans | 26 | ↑1 | 1-4 | 24 | 31 | 20 | -13 |
| Indianapolis | 27 | ↓12 | 2-3 | 26 | 22 | 22 | -45 |
| Jacksonville | 28 | ↓2 | 1-4 | 31 | 29 | 18 | -73 |
| Cleveland | 29 | ↑3 | 1-5 | 30 | 26 | 24 | -29 |
| Tennessee | 30 | ↓1 | 2-4 | 27 | 25 | 14 | -90 |
| Oakland | 31 | ↓1 | 1-4 | 29 | 30 | 30 | -61 |
| Kansas City | 32 | ↓1 | 1-5 | 32 | 32 | 29 | -79 |
Best
Best undefeated team: Atlanta
Best 5 win team: Houston
Best 4 win team: Chicago
Best 3 win team: New England
Best 2 win team: Detroit
Best 1 win team: Carolina
Worst
Worst 5 win team: Baltimore
Worst 4 win team: Minnesota
Worst 3 win team: San Diego
Worst 2 win team: Tennessee
Worst 1 win team: Kansas City
Worst team in the league: Kansas City
Most
Most under-rated team: (#12) St. Louis (ESPN has them 20)
Most over-rated team: (#24) Pittsburgh (ESPN has them 14)
Cheers.
NFL Predictions – Week 6
Overall Records for 2012
SU: 53-38 (58.24%)
ATS: 51-40 (56.04%)
O/U: 50-39 (56.18%)
Week 6 (6-8 SU, 7-7 ATS, 6-7 O/U)
Week 5 (10-4 SU, 7-7 ATS, 7-7 O/U)
Week 4 (10-5 SU, 10-5 ATS, 12-2 O/U)
Week 3 (5-11 SU, 9-7 ATS, 9-7 O/U)
Week 2 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Week 1 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Week 6
Thursday @8:25pm
Pittsburgh Steelers at Tennessee Titans
Prediction: Steelers win 23-20
Pick: Titans +5.5
O/U: Over 42.5
Sunday @1pm
Kansas City Chiefs at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Prediction: Buccaneers win 20-19
Pick: Chiefs +3.5
O/U: Under 41.5
Dallas Cowboys at Baltimore Ravens
Prediction: Ravens win 25-22
Pick: Cowboys +3.5
O/U: Over 44
St. Louis Rams at Miami Dolphins
Prediction: Dolphins win 22-16
Pick: Dolphins -3.5
O/U: Over 37.5
Oakland Raiders at Atlanta Falcons
Prediction: Falcons win 27-22
Pick: Raiders +9
O/U: Over 48.5
Detroit Lions at Philadelphia Eagles
Prediction: Eagles win 28-27
Pick: Lions +5.5
O/U: Over 47.5
Cincinnati Bengals at Cleveland Browns
Prediction: Bengals win 21-17
Pick: Bengals -2
O/U: Under 44
Indianapolis Colts at New York Jets
Prediction: Colts win 21-20
Pick: Colts +3.5
O/U: Under 42.5
Sunday @4:05pm
Buffalo Bills at Arizona Cardinals
Prediction: Cardinals win 23-22
Pick: Bills +5.5
O/U: Over 43
Sunday @4:25pm
New England Patriots at Seattle Seahawks
Prediction: Patriots win 32-19
Pick: Patriots -3.5
O/U: Over 44
New York Giants at San Francisco 49ers
Prediction: Giants 26-25
Pick: Giants +5.5
O/U: Over 44.5
Minnesota Vikings at Washington Redskins
Prediction: Vikings win 24-22
Pick: Vikings +2.5
O/U: Off the board
Sunday @8:30pm
Green Bay Packers at Houston Texans
Prediction: Packers win 29-24
Pick: Packers +5.5
O/U: Over 48
Monday @8:35pm
Denver Broncos at San Diego Chargers
Prediction: Chargers win 29-22
Pick: Chargers -2.5
O/U: Over 49.5
Cheers.
Week 5 QB Performances Reviewed Via RIPPEN
Alex Smith led the way in quarterback performances this week with an astonishing RIPPEN just over 43, and Blaine Gabbert continues to dwell at the bottom of all of my tables with a RIPPEN just above 3.
RIPPEN rankings for week 5 performances:
| Player | Team | RIPPEN | QB rating |
| Smith, A. | SF | 43.014 | 156.2 |
| Tannehill, R. | MIA | 34.387 | 92.3 |
| Brady, T. | NE | 28.045 | 104.6 |
| Rivers, P. | SD | 26.194 | 96.7 |
| Cutler, J. | CHI | 24.361 | 88.8 |
| Brees, D. | NO | 22.586 | 110.4 |
| Wilson, R. | SEA | 21.676 | 82.2 |
| Rodgers, A. | GB | 19.363 | 103.5 |
| Ryan, M. | ATL | 19.293 | 89.0 |
| Schaub, M. | TEX | 19.174 | 71.9 |
| Weeden, B. | CLE | 17.863 | 84.3 |
| Griffin, III, R. | WAS | 17.237 | 82.9 |
| Manning, P. | DEN | 17.206 | 116.2 |
| Luck, A. | IND | 15.959 | 81.0 |
| Ponder, C. | MIN | 15.934 | 87.6 |
| Manning, E. | NYG | 15.532 | 103.3 |
| Flacco, J. | BAL | 13.647 | 55.6 |
| Sanchez, M. | NYJ | 12.100 | 54.5 |
| Vick, M. | PHI | 11.185 | 104.2 |
| Kolb, K. | ARI | 10.787 | 72.7 |
| Roethlisberger, B. | PIT | 8.572 | 80.1 |
| Bradford, S. | STL | 8.025 | 69.7 |
| Newton, C. | CAR | 7.107 | 56.8 |
| Cassel, M. | KC | 5.758 | 38.1 |
| Dalton. A. | CIN | 5.575 | 63.5 |
| Hasselbeck, M. | TEN | 5.386 | 69.9 |
| Fitzpatrick, R. | BUF | 4.217 | 57.5 |
| Gabbert, B. | JAX | 3.096 | 37.7 |
Looking at RIPPEN based on the whole season, Tom Brady is ranked number 1 with a RIPPEN of 27.304, which is essentially the same as RGIII’s RIPPEN of 27.279. The top five is rounded out by Payton Manning, Alex Smith, and Matt Ryan. My RIPPEN top five is the exact same top five as sorted by season QB rating, but in a different order. QB rating has the top five guys ranked Smith, Ryan, Brady, Manning, RGIII.
The bottom five according to RIPPEN are Weeden, Kolb, Cassel, Gabbert, and, dead last, Matt Hasselbeck. QB rating has three of these quarterbacks in the bottom five (Weeden, Cassel, and Gabbert), but by QB rating Sanchez and Tannehill are also in the bottom five. I have Tannehill 19th and Sanchez 25th out of 32 quarterbacks.
As for most over and under rated quarterbacks, I regressed QB rating as a function of RIPPEN and, as expected, they are highly related. (QB rating is approximately 58 + 1.63*RIPPEN). However, there are some large deviations. The most under-rated quarterback based on QB rating is Cam Newton. His QB rating is only 80.9, but, based on RIPPEN, we’d expect him to have a QB rating about 16 points higher around 97. Other under-rated quarterbacks include Ryan Tannehill who is about 14 points lower than expected and Mark Sanchez who is about 11 points lower than expected. (But don’t get me wrong here, I still think Sanchez is a terrible quarterback. I just don’t think he is the 30th best quarterback in the league, I think he’s 25th.)
The most over-rated QB based on passer rating is Kevin Kolb. Based on his passer rating, he is ranked 16th among quarterbacks, but RIPPEN has him ranking 29th. Based on his RIPPEN, his expected QB rating is 75.3 about 14 points lower than it actually is. This is likely do to the weight that passer rating gives to touchdown passes. The next two most over-rated QB’s are Ben Roethlisberger and Eli Manning. Roethlisberger has a QB rating about 11 points higher than we would expect and Manning is about 10 points higher than expected.
Season RIPPEN rankings through five weeks of games:
| Player | Team | RIPPEN | QB rating |
| Brady, T. | NE | 27.304 | 102.8 |
| Griffin, III, R. | WAS | 27.279 | 101.0 |
| Manning, P. | DEN | 26.905 | 101.2 |
| Smith, A. | SF | 25.630 | 108.7 |
| Ryan, M. | ATL | 24.263 | 106.1 |
| Newton, C. | CAR | 23.978 | 80.9 |
| Schaub, M. | HOU | 23.689 | 99.2 |
| Ponder, C. | MIN | 20.393 | 95.5 |
| Rodgers, A. | GB | 19.697 | 97.0 |
| Rivers, P. | SD | 19.654 | 93.1 |
| Roethlisberger, B. | PIT | 19.131 | 100.6 |
| Dalton, A. | CIN | 19.091 | 92.9 |
| Brees, D. | NO | 18.720 | 90.7 |
| Cutler, J. | CHI | 18.243 | 78.7 |
| Stafford, M. | DET | 17.664 | 81.6 |
| Manning, E. | NYG | 16.843 | 96.0 |
| Luck, A. | IND | 16.770 | 77.1 |
| Flacco, J. | BAL | 16.380 | 89.9 |
| Tannehill, R. | MIA | 16.245 | 70.4 |
| Romo, T. | DAL | 15.928 | 78.5 |
| Vick, M. | PHI | 15.780 | 77.8 |
| Bradford, S. | STL | 14.544 | 78.6 |
| Palmer, C. | OAK | 13.065 | 86.0 |
| Freeman, J. | TB | 12.533 | 75.3 |
| Sanchez, M. | NYJ | 11.917 | 66.6 |
| Wilson, R. | SEA | 10.782 | 75.2 |
| Fitzpatrick, R. | BUF | 10.761 | 84.2 |
| Weeden, B. | CLE | 10.465 | 64.5 |
| Kolb, K. | ARI | 10.417 | 89.7 |
| Cassel, M. | KC | 8.357 | 66.2 |
| Gabbert, B. | JAX | 6.678 | 73.3 |
| Hasselbeck, M. | TEN | 5.606 | 73.6 |
And finally, below is a plot of estimated outcome percentages that are used in calculating RIPPEN. If you look at Peyton Manning in the upper right corner of the plot you can see that starting from his own 20 yard line and only throwing passes in a simulated world, hell score a touchdown about 32% of the time and convert a field goal about 16% of the time. So he’d score on around 48% of drives. Compare this with Blaine Gabbert who will score a touchdown on about 6% of drives and get a filed goal about 9% of drives. This means that 85% of Gabbert drives, in the simulated RIPPEN world, end in either a punt, an interception, or a missed field goal.
NFL Rankings – After Week 17
Rankings updated as of 1/1/2012; Records updated as of 1/1/2012; CHFF rankings as of 12/28/2011
AFC NFC
Playoff team
Division Champ
Eliminated from Playoffs
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | CHFF Rank |
| New England | 1 | – | 13-3 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | 2 | ↑ | 12-4 | 1 |
| Green Bay | 3 | ↓ | 15-1 | 6 |
| Baltimore | 4 | – | 12-4 | 5 |
| Atlanta | 5 | – | 10-6 | 11 |
| 6 | ↑ | 8-8 | 2 | |
| New Orleans | 7 | ↓ | 13-3 | 15 |
| 8 | – | 8-8 | 23 | |
| Detroit | 9 | ↑↑ | 10-6 | 10 |
| San Francisco | 10 | – | 13-3 | 4 |
| NY Giants | 11 | ↓↓ | 9-7 | 8 |
| 12 | – | 8-8 | 12 | |
| 13 | – | 8-8 | 18 | |
| 14 | ↑ | 4-12 | 14 | |
| 15 | ↑↑ | 7-9 | 30 | |
| 16 | ↑↑↑↑ | 7-9 | 9 | |
| 17 | ↓↓↓ | 8-8 | 26 | |
| Cincinnati | 18 | ↓↓ | 9-7 | 22 |
| 19 | ↑↑ | 8-8 | 7 | |
| 20 | ↑↑ | 9-7 | 19 | |
| 21 | ↓↓↓ | 6-10 | 13 | |
| Houston | 22 | ↓↓↓ | 10-6 | 20 |
| 23 | – | 6-10 | 24 | |
| 24 | ↑ | 2-14 | 16 | |
| Denver | 25 | ↓ | 8-8 | 30 |
| 26 | ↑↑↑↑ | 5-11 | 28 | |
| 27 | ↓ | 3-13 | 27 | |
| 28 | ↓ | 4-12 | 21 | |
| 29 | ↓ | 8-8 | 29 | |
| 30 | ↓ | 5-11 | 25 | |
| 31 | – | 6-10 | 17 | |
| 32 | – | 2-14 | 32 |
BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.
Cheers.
NFL Rankings Christmas Edition – 12/22/2011
Rankings updated as of 12/22/2011; Records updated as of 6:22pm 12/24/2011
AFC NFC
Clinched Playoff Berth
Divison Leader Division Champ
Eliminated from Playoffs
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | CHFF Rank |
| New England | 1 | ↑ | 12-3 | 3 |
| Green Bay | 2 | ↓ | 13-1 | 1 |
| Pittsburgh | 3 | – | 11-4 | 7 |
| Baltimore | 4 | – | 11-4 | 6 |
| Atlanta | 5 | – | 9-5 | 8 |
| New Orleans | 6 | ↑ | 11-3 | 2 |
| NY Jets | 7 | ↓ | 8-7 | 11 |
| Chicago | 8 | – | 7-7 | 23 |
| San Francisco | 9 | ↑↑ | 11-3 | 4 |
| NY Giants | 10 | ↓↓ | 8-7 | 14 |
| Detroit | 11 | ↓ | 9-5 | 9 |
| 12 | – | 6-8 | 17 | |
| San Diego | 13 | ↑↑ | 7-7 | 13 |
| 14 | ↓ | 4-11 | 29 | |
| 15 | ↑↑ | 6-9 | 25 | |
| Houston | 16 | ↓↓ | 10-5 | 5 |
| Oakland | 17 | ↓ | 8-7 | 16 |
| Seattle | 18 | ↑↑↑ | 7-7 | 18 |
| 19 | ↓ | 5-10 | 20 | |
| Dallas | 20 | ↑↑ | 8-6 | 10 |
| Cincinnati | 21 | ↓ | 9-6 | 12 |
| Tennessee | 22 | ↓↓↓ | 8-7 | 22 |
| Denver | 23 | – | 8-6 | 15 |
| 24 | – | 6-9 | 26 | |
| 25 | ↑↑↑↑ | 7-8 | 19 | |
| 26 | ↓ | 4-11 | 27 | |
| 27 | ↓ | 4-11 | 28 | |
| 28 | – | 2-13 | 32 | |
| 29 | ↑ | 5-10 | 24 | |
| 30 | ↓↓↓ | 3-12 | 30 | |
| 31 | – | 2-13 | 31 | |
| 32 | – | 6-9 | 21 |
BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.
Cheers.
An arbitrary ranking of NCAA college basketball teams – 12/11/2011
Rankings as of noon on 12/11/2011 .
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | AP (12/12/11) |
| Indiana | 1 | 0 | 9-0 | 18 |
| Illinois | 2 | 0 | 10-0 | 19 |
| Syracuse | 3 | 0 | 10-0 | 1 |
| Minnesota | 4 | 0 | 10-1 | |
| Marquette | 5 | 0 | 9-0 | 11 |
| Northwestern | 6 | 0 | 7-1 | 40 |
| Ohio State | 7 | 0 | 8-1 | 2 |
| Missouri | 8 | 0 | 9-0 | 10 |
| Duke | 9 | 0 | 9-1 | 7 |
| Louisville | 10 | 0 | 9-0 | 4 |
| Baylor | 11 | 0 | 7-0 | 6 |
| Northern Iowa | 12 | 0 | 9-1 | 35 |
| Purdue | 13 | 0 | 9-2 | |
| Michigan State | 14 | 0 | 8-2 | 21 |
| Wisconsin | 15 | 0 | 8-2 | 14 |
| Pittsburgh | 16 | 0 | 9-1 | 15 |
| Seton Hall | 17 | 0 | 8-1 | |
| Kansas | 18 | 0 | 7-2 | 12 |
| Xavier | 19 | 0 | 8-0 | 8 |
| San Diego State | 20 | 0 | 9-2 | 28 |
| Connecticut | 21 | 0 | 8-1 | 9 |
| Oklahoma | 22 | 0 | 7-1 | |
| Ole Miss | 23 | 0 | 8-1 | |
| Michigan | 24 | 0 | 7-2 | 20 |
| Saint Louis | 25 | 0 | 9-1 | 32 |
BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.
Cheers.
One More Arbitrary NCAA Football Ranking Scheme for the BCS – 12/4/2011
Rankings as of 12/04/2011. Previous weeks rankings here.
The BCS explained: It used to be that a national champion in college football was determined solely by human polls. However, human polls are suspect because you are asking each voter to process the results of hundreds of college football games from teams all across the country and form a well thought out, reasoned ranking of the top 25 teams, which is clearly impossible; It’s too much data for a human to handle. That’s why the BCS introduced the computer rankings which could, without personal bias, crunch the numbers and produce a ranking taking all games into account equally. The computer rankings, on the average, do a very reasonable job of ranking the teams. Ultimately, however, the non-human polls, a computational exercise in futility, are simply ignored, as they are overwhelmed by the human polls, and the BCS gets what it wants while it hides behind the computer polls to offer a whiff of legitimacy to the absolute garbage it spews out.
BCS Bowl Team
ACC Big East Big Ten Big 12 Pac 12 SEC Other
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | BCS Rank |
| LSU | 1 | – | 13-0 | 1 |
| Oklahoma State | 2 | – | 11-1 | 3 |
| Kansas State | 3 | ↑↑ | 10-2 | 8 |
| Alabama | 4 | ↑ | 11-1 | 2 |
| Oklahoma | 5 | ↓↓ | 9-3 | 14 |
| Baylor | 6 | ↑ | 9-3 | 12 |
| Stanford | 7 | ↓ | 11-1 | 4 |
| Oregon | 8 | ↑↑↑ | 11-2 | 5 |
| Arkansas | 9 | ↓ | 10-2 | 6 |
| South Carolina | 10 | ↓ | 10-2 | 9 |
| USC | 11 | ↓ | 10-2 | |
| Georgia | 12 | – | 10-3 | 16 |
| Virginia Tech | 13 | – | 11-2 | 11 |
| Boise State | 14 | ↑↑↑ | 11-1 | 7 |
| Michigan | 15 | ↑ | 10-2 | 13 |
| Wisconsin | 16 | ↑↑ | 11-2 | 10 |
| Texas | 17 | ↓↓↓ | 7-5 | 24 |
| Clemson | 18 | ↑↑↑↑ | 10-3 | 15 |
| Nebraska | 19 | ↓ | 9-3 | 20 |
| Houston | 20 | ↓↓↓↓↓ | 12-1 | 19 |
| Missouri | 21 | – | 7-5 | |
| TCU | 22 | ↑↑↑↑↑ | 10-2 | 18 |
| Michigan State | 23 | ↓↓↓ | 10-3 | 17 |
| Penn State | 24 | ↑ | 9-3 | 22 |
| Texas A&M | 25 | ↓ | 6-6 |
And finally, representing the Big East/Big Least: West Virginia
BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.
Cheers.

