Category Archives: NFL
NFL Week 3 Predictions
Overall Records for 2012
SU: 27-21 (56.25%)
ATS: 27-21 (56.25%)
O/U: 25-23 (52.08%)
Week 3 (5-11 SU, 9-7 ATS, 9-7 OU)
Week 2 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Week 1 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Thursday @8:20pm
New York Giants at Carolina Panthers
Prediction: Panthers win 27-26
Pick: Panthers +1.5
O/U: Over 49.5
Sunday @1pm
Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Dallas Cowboys
Prediction: Cowboys win 24-20
Pick: Buccaneers +8
O/U: Under 46
New York Jets at Miami Dolphins
Prediction: Dolphins win 22-21
Pick: Dolphins +3.5
O/U: Over 40
Kansas City Chiefs at New Orleans Saints
Prediction: Saints win 34-18
Pick: Saints -9
O/U: Under 54
Cincinnati Bengals at Washington Redskins
Prediction: Bengals 20-16
Pick: Bengals +4.5
O/U: Under 49
Detroit Lions at Tennessee Titans
Prediction: Lions win 25-21
Pick: Lions -3.5
O/U: Under 47
San Francisco 49ers at Minnesota Vikings
Prediction: 49ers win 24-20
Pick: Vikings +7.5
O/U: Over 43
Jacksonville Jaguars at Indianapolis Colts
Prediction: Colts win 20-14
Pick: Colts -2.5
O/U: Under 42
St. Louis Rams at Chicago Bears
Prediction: Bears win 23-15
Pick: Rams +9
O/U: Under 44.5
Buffalo Bills at Cleveland Browns
Prediction: Bills 23-18
Pick: Bills -3
O/U: Under 44
Sunday @4:05pm
Atlanta Falcons at San Diego Chargers
Prediction: Chargers 26-25
Pick: Falcons +3.5
O/U: Over 47.5
Philadelphia Eagles at Arizona Cardinals
Prediction: Eagles 28-23
Pick: Eagles -3.5
O/U: Over 43.5
Sunday @4:25pm
Pittsburgh Steelers at Oakland Raiders
Prediction: Steelers 24-23
Pick: Raiders +4.5
O/U: Over 44.5
Houston Texans at Denver Broncos
Prediction: Texans win 25-21
Pick: Texans -2
O/U: Over 44.5
Sunday @8:20
New England Patriots at Baltimore Ravens
Prediction: Patriots win 29-22
Pick: Patriots +3.5
O/U: Over 48.5
Monday @8:30pm
Green Bay Packers at Seattle Seahawks
Prediction: Packers win 29-19
Pick: Packers -3.5
O/U: Over 47
NFL Rankings – Week 3
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 18, 2012 at 6:10pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | ESPN | TeamRankings.com | SOS | Points Diff |
| San Francisco | 1 | ↑1 | 2-0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | +16 |
| Green Bay | 2 | ↓1 | 1-1 | 4 | 13 | 23 | +5 |
| New England | 3 | – | 1-1 | 5 | 7 | 32 | +19 |
| Baltimore | 4 | – | 1-1 | 6 | 6 | 7 | +30 |
| Pittsburgh | 5 | ↑1 | 1-1 | 9 | 12 | 22 | +5 |
| New Orleans | 6 | ↓1 | 0-2 | 24 | 23 | 24 | -16 |
| Houston | 7 | ↑2 | 2-0 | 2 | 10 | 29 | +40 |
| Atlanta | 8 | – | 2-0 | 3 | 9 | 30 | +22 |
| Detroit | 9 | ↓2 | 1-1 | 13 | 14 | 12 | -4 |
| San Diego | 10 | ↑2 | 2-0 | 11 | 11 | 26 | +36 |
| Philadelphia | 11 | ↓1 | 2-0 | 7 | 4 | 11 | +2 |
| Arizona | 12 | ↑5 | 2-0 | 14 | 1 | 2 | +6 |
| NY Giants | 13 | ↑2 | 1-1 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Seattle | 14 | ↑5 | 1-1 | 17 | 3 | 5 | +16 |
| Chicago | 15 | ↓4 | 1-1 | 12 | 21 | 13 | +7 |
| Cincinnati | 16 | ↑2 | 1-1 | 16 | 17 | 19 | -24 |
| NY Jets | 17 | ↓4 | 1-1 | 18 | 20 | 15 | +3 |
| Denver | 18 | ↓2 | 1-1 | 10 | 16 | 4 | +6 |
| Dallas | 19 | ↓5 | 1-1 | 15 | 5 | 6 | -13 |
| Miami | 20 | ↑3 | 1-1 | 25 | 18 | 21 | +2 |
| Carolina | 21 | ↑3 | 1-1 | 19 | 22 | 20 | +2 |
| Tennessee | 22 | ↓2 | 0-2 | 26 | 27 | 18 | -49 |
| Buffalo | 23 | ↑3 | 1-1 | 22 | 25 | 28 | -2 |
| Washington | 24 | ↓2 | 1-1 | 20 | 15 | 17 | +5 |
| Oakland | 25 | ↓4 | 0-2 | 30 | 28 | 27 | -30 |
| Kansas City | 26 | ↓1 | 0-2 | 28 | 30 | 31 | -34 |
| Minnesota | 27 | – | 1-1 | 29 | 31 | 9 | 0 |
| Tampa Bay | 28 | – | 1-1 | 21 | 24 | 25 | -1 |
| Cleveland | 29 | ↑1 | 0-2 | 32 | 26 | 8 | -8 |
| Jacksonville | 30 | ↓1 | 0-2 | 31 | 32 | 14 | -23 |
| St. Louis | 31 | – | 1-1 | 23 | 19 | 3 | -1 |
| Indianapolis | 32 | – | 1-1 | 27 | 29 | 16 | -17 |
Cheers.
Going for 2
Update: Apparently, it seems, I am completely wrong about this, and that it is well established that a team should go for two earlier. Via Twitter, @bdoc87 points to the book “Mathletics” where they suggest going to two in this situation as early as the second quarter. There is also this chart, which says that you should go for two at any point in the second half if you are down 9 after scoring a touchdown.
Here is an article by Chase Stuart from www.footballperspective.com with the title “Trailing by 15 in the middle of the 4th quarter, teams are foolish to not go for 2 after touchdowns”. They are arguing, as stated in the title of the article, that if a team is down by 15 in the middle of the final quarter and they score a touchdown (cutting the lead to 9), that they should go for two in an attempt to cut the lead to 7 rather than take the extra point and cut the lead to 8. This is a fair argument and the author may well be correct, but they seem to offer absolutely no evidence that this is the correct decision. For instance, the author states:
If you are going to convert the 2-point attempt, it doesn’t matter all that much whether you go for it early or late. If you’re going to miss it, going for it earlier significantly improves your odds of pulling off a miraculous comeback, precisely because you’re [sic] got almost no chance if you miss it late.
The author first notes that it doesn’t really matter whether you go for the 2 points early or late if you are going to convert it. Sure fine, I’ll agree with that. But then in the next sentence argues that “going for it earlier significantly improves your odds of pulling off a miraculous comeback”. Is this true? It may well be, but I see nothing in the article that even remotely supports this point. It seems to just be stated as fact with no supporting evidence. I am gonna need more proof than this. Ideally, one would look to collect actual data on this, and try to compare the two decisions. However, it seems like football coaches almost always go for one, so a simulation study may be better here. Make some assumptions, develop a model for a football game, and simulate this scenario say 10000 times going for the extra point and 10000 times going for 2. Then you can estimate the probabilities of a win and say a team will win X percent of the time going for 1 and Y percent of the time going to 2. I suspect there probably really isn’t much of a difference at all, but I have no evidence for or against this point. It’s simply my opinion. It looks to me like this entire article is stating a hypothesis (going for two is better than going for one), and that it is the authors opinion that going for two is better than going for one. However, they seem to offer no evidence at all in support of their claims. Although maybe I am missing something.
Go Falcons!
Cheers.
NFL Week 2 Predictions
Week 2 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Thursday @8:20pm
Chicago Bears at Green Bay Packers
Prediction: Packers wins 26-21
Pick: Packers -5
O/U: Under 50.5
Sunday @1pm
Tampa Bay Buccaneers at New York Giants
Prediction: Giants 24-21
Pick: Buccaneers +7.5
O/U: Over 43.5
Arizona Cardinals at New England Patriots
Prediction: Patriots wins 28-20
Pick: Cardinals +13.5
O/U: Under 48
Minnesota Vikings at Indianapolis Colts
Prediction: Colts win 23-22
Pick: Colts +1.5
O/U: Over 44
New Orleans Saints at Carolina Panthers
Prediction: Saints win 29-20
Pick: Saints -2.5
O/U: Under 50.5
Kansas City Chiefs at Buffalo Bills
Prediction: Bills win 21-20
Pick: Chiefs +3.5
O/U: Under 45
Baltimore Ravens at Philadelphia Eagles
Prediction: Ravens win 25-24
Pick: Ravens +2.5
O/U: Over 46
Oakland Raiders at Miami Dolphins
Prediction: Dolphins win 21-18
Pick: Dolphins +2.5
O/U: Over 37.5
Cleveland Browns at Cincinnati Bengals
Prediction: Cincinnati wins 18-16
Pick: Browns +9.5
O/U: Under 38.5
Houston Texans at Jacksonville Jaguars
Prediction: Texans win 25-18
Pick: Jaguars +7.5
O/U: Over 41.5
Sunday @4:05pm
Dallas Cowboys at Seattle Seahawks
Prediction: Cowboys win 24-18
Pick: Dallas -3.5
O/U: Over 41.5
Sunday @4:25pm
Washington Redskins at St. Louis Rams
Prediction: Redskins win 18-16
Pick: Rams +3.5
O/U: Under 45.5
New York Jets at Pittsburgh Steelers
Prediction: Steelers win 23-22
Pick: Jets +6.5
O/U: Over 41.5
Tennessee Titans at San Diego Chargers
Prediction: Chargers win 26-21
Pick: Titans +5.5
O/U: Over 44.5
Sunday @8:25
Detroit Lions at San Francisco 49ers
Prediction: 49ers win 22-21
Pick: Lions +6.5
O/U: Under 46.5
Monday @8:35pm
Denver Broncos at Atlanta Falcons
Prediction: Falcons win 25-20
Pick: Falcons -3.5
O/U: Under 51
NFL Week 1 predictions
Week 1 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Wednesday @8:30pm
Dallas Cowboys at New York Giants
Prediction: Dallas wins 24-23
Pick: Cowboys +3.5
O/U: Over 47
Sunday @1pm
Indianapolis Colts at Chicago Bears
Prediction: Indianapolis wins 22-21
Pick: Colts +10
O/U: Over 41.5
Philadelphia Eagles at Cleveland Browns
Prediction: Eagles win 24-16
Pick: Eagles -8.5
O/U: Under 41
Buffalo Bills at New York Jets
Prediction: Jets win 23-20
Pick: Jets -3
O/U: Over 41
Washington Redskins at New Orleans Saints
Prediction: Saints win 28-17
Pick: Saints -9.5
O/U: Under 49.5
New England Patriots at Tennessee Titans
Prediction: Patriots win 27-20
Pick: Patriots -6.5
O/U: Under 47.5
Jacksonville Jaguars at Minnesota Vikings
Prediction: Vikings win 23-20
Pick: Jaguars +4.5
O/U: Over 38
Miami Dolphins at Houston Texans
Prediction: Texans win 23-21
Pick: Dolphins +9.5
O/U: Over 43
St. Louis Rams at Detroit Lions
Prediction: Lions win 21-16
Pick: Rams +9
O/U: Under 46.5
Atlanta Falcons at Kansas City Chiefs
Prediction: Falcons win 24-17
Pick: Falcons -1
O/U: Under 41.5
Sunday @4:25pm
Seattle Seahawks at Arizona Cardinals
Prediction: Cardinals win 22-19
Pick: Cardinals +1.5
O/U: Under 40.5
San Francisco 49ers at Green Bay Packers
Prediction: Packers wins 27-19
Pick: Packers -5.5
O/U: Over 45
Carolina Panthers at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Prediction: Panthers wins 21-20
Pick: Buccaneers +2.5
O/U: Under 46.5
Sunday @8:20
Pittsburgh Steelers at Denver Broncos
Prediction: Steelers win 23-20
Pick: Steelers Even
O/U: Under 44
Monday @7pm
Cincinnati Bengals at Baltimore Ravens
Prediction: Ravens win 23-18
Pick: Bengals +6
O/U: Over 40.5
Monday @10:15pm
San Diego Chargers at Oakland Raiders
Prediction: Chargers win 27-19
Pick: Chargers -1.5
O/U: Under 47.5
Cheers.
NFL preview
Season Preview
It’s almost here! Another season of grown men smashing their brains together for our entertainment. And entertained we will be.
So, let’s start at the end: which teams are most likely to be suffering life-lengthening (Not really) massive head injuries in February 2013 in New Orleans? I’m once again making a not so bold prediction and taking Green Bay over New England in the Super Bowl this year.
Some Comments
AFC
East
New England has the easier road to New Orleans of the two by playing the softest regular season schedule of any team this year. For starters, they play in the AFC east which features Buffalo, Miami, and the New York Jets. None of those teams had winning records last year, and they all failed to make the playoffs. The Patriots then go on to play the AFC South and the NFC West. The teams in these two divisions had a combined record of 56-72 last year. In fact, they play only 3 games all of 2012 against teams that had winning records in 2011. If they beat baltimore in week 3, they could very reasonably be 8-0 at their bye week. If they start the first half of their season any worse than 6-2, it’s a disaster.
The Jets, Dolphins, and Bills are good teams, but none of them are very good teams. They all get screwed annually by having to play New England twice every single year.
North
I always feel bad for the wild card team that always seems to come out of this division. You win 11+games and, not only do you not get a bye week, you have to go ON THE ROAD to play some crap team from the AFC west after they “earned” home field advantage. (What I’m saying is that Pittsburgh should not have had to go to Denver last year.)
I think Pittsburgh wins this division in a close race by either one game or in a tie-breaker with Baltimore. The season’s biggest game outside the division is Baltimore’s game against New England. Pittsburgh avoids having to play the Patriots this year and that might just be enough to get them the division title.
South
Texans.
West
Any of these teams has a legitimate shot to limp to a division title and playoff game (at home!). I think San Diego wins it this year thanks to a much, much easier schedule than division foe Denver, who is the most likely team to challenge for the division. Denver’s first 8 opponents all had at least 8 wins last year, and six of those 8 went to the playoffs. Good luck Peyton. Any of the four teams could realistically win this division, and there is a chance they could do it 2010 Seattle Seahawks style. The AFC West drew the AFC North and the NFC South this year on their schedule. So they’ll have to play Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Cincinnati, New Orleans and Atlanta: All 2011 playoff teams. At least they all get to console themselves with the statement “Hey, at least we get to play [Insert AFC West team] twice”. My dream is to see a team a 6-10 team make the playoffs and this year’s schedule and division of mediocrity are certainly keeping my hopes alive.
NFC
East
New York, Dallas, or Philadelphia has a real chance to win this division this year, but I think the Eagles get it done. I thought the Eagles were the best team in this division last year, and I think they’re the best team in the division again. It also helps that they have the easiest schedule of any of the teams that have a legitimate chance to win the division (Washington does not).
North
Green Bay wins the division by at least two games. The interesting question is who finishes second. I’m taking Detroit as runner-up and earning a wild card spot and 5th seed in the NFC.
South
I think New Orleans is going to win this division again, but Atlanta will make it close. I’ll pick Atlanta to get the second wild card because I have to pick someone. But there are at least 6 other teams that have a real shot at it (New York, Dallas, Chicago, Carolina, Seattle, Arizona).
West
San Francisco is too talented to not win this division again, but I think it’ll be a lot closer than a lot of people are making it out to be. I think the real question in this division is can two teams get to the playoffs. Two years ago, this division was been all-time bad (they sent a 7-9 team to the playoffs!), but it was much more competitive in 2011.
Seattle has 11 games in 2012 against teams that were 8-8 or worse in 2011. If they can manage a winning record in those 11 games and pick up a few quality wins they can make a nice little run at the wildcard, but their going to have to earn it. They aren’t getting into the playoffs this year thanks to an easy schedule. They play San Francisco in Seattle on December 23 and could prove to be a critical game for both teams.
Arizona also has a very difficult schedule. They play games at New England, at Green Bay, at Atlanta, and at San Francisco. I’d be surprised if they won any of these games, and I’d be stunned if they won 2 or more. Unfortunately, this tough schedule probably leaves them out of the playoffs.
2012 Pre-Season Rankings
| Team | Rank | Ex W | SOS | SB Odds | WSEX odds | 2011 Wins |
| Green Bay | 1 | 11.17 | 23 | 6.7-1 | 6-1 | 15 |
| New England | 2 | 10.68 | 32 | 7.7-1 | 7-1 | 13 |
| New Orleans | 3 | 10.47 | 24 | 9.1-1 | 15-1 | 13 |
| San Francisco | 4 | 10.18 | 10 | 9.4-1 | 13-1 | 13 |
| Baltimore | 5 | 9.73 | 7 | 11.5-1 | 17-1 | 12 |
| Pittsburgh | 6 | 9.85 | 22 | 15.3-1 | 15-1 | 12 |
| Detroit | 7 | 9.15 | 12 | 21-1 | 30-1 | 10 |
| Houston | 8 | 9.15 | 29 | 18-1 | 10-1 | 10 |
| Atlanta | 9 | 9.00 | 30 | 27-1 | 25-1 | 10 |
| Philadelphia | 10 | 8.56 | 11 | 30-1 | 12-1 | 8 |
| Cincinnati | 11 | 8.54 | 19 | 38-1 | 45-1 | 9 |
| New York (G) | 12 | 8.01 | 1 | 44-1 | 17-1 | 9 |
| Chicago | 13 | 8.31 | 13 | 42-1 | 23-1 | 8 |
| San Diego | 14 | 8.44 | 26 | 40-1 | 25-1 | 8 |
| New York (J) | 15 | 8.09 | 15 | 54-1 | 32-1 | 8 |
| Seattle | 16 | 7.91 | 5 | 87-1 | 65-1 | 7 |
| Tennessee | 17 | 8.06 | 18 | 54-1 | 90-1 | 9 |
| Dallas | 18 | 7.85 | 6 | 35-1 | 25-1 | 8 |
| Miami | 19 | 7.79 | 21 | 53-1 | 110-1 | 6 |
| Arizona | 20 | 7.33 | 2 | 103-1 | 80-1 | 8 |
| Denver | 21 | 7.25 | 4 | 115-1 | 20-1 | 8 |
| Oakland | 22 | 7.49 | 27 | 77-1 | 100-1 | 8 |
| Carolina | 23 | 7.35 | 20 | 115-1 | 45-1 | 6 |
| Buffalo | 24 | 7.24 | 28 | 142-1 | 65-1 | 6 |
| Kansas City | 25 | 7.01 | 31 | 146-1 | 50-1 | 7 |
| Washington | 26 | 6.52 | 17 | 350-1 | 70-1 | 5 |
| Jacksonville | 27 | 6.41 | 14 | 710-1 | 160-1 | 5 |
| Cleveland | 28 | 6.17 | 8 | 1000-1 | 200-1 | 4 |
| Minnesota | 29 | 6.20 | 9 | 4501-1 | 180-1 | 3 |
| Tampa Bay | 30 | 5.70 | 25 | 2500-1 | 100-1 | 4 |
| St. Louis | 31 | 5.17 | 3 | 2500-1 | 110-1 | 2 |
| Indianapolis | 32 | 5.22 | 16 | 1600-1 | 120-1 | 2 |
Ex W – Average number of wins a team would have if the season was played 100,000 times.
SOS (Strength of schedule) – The average of the strength coefficients for each opponent on a team’s schedule.
SB Odds – SITW estimated odds that the team wins the Super Bowl
WSEX Odds – http://www.wsex.com odds to win Super Bowl
Predicted Standings for 2012 Season
Team: Predicted Record (Prob Make Playoffs, Super Bowl Wins Odds)
AFC East
- New England Patriots: 11-5 (85.44%, 7.7-1)
- New York Jets: 8-8 (37.3%, 54-1)
- Miami Dolphins: 8-8 (34.84%, 53-1)
- Buffalo Bills: 7-9 (26.38%, 142-1)
AFC North
- Pittsburgh Steelers: 10-6 (65.96%, 15.3-1)
- Baltimore Ravens: 10-6 (68.52%, 11.5-1)
- Cincinnati Bengals: 9-7 (41.86%, 38-1)
- Cleveland Browns: 6-10 (7.1%, 1000-1)
AFC South
- Houston: 9-7 (68.54%, 18-1)
- Tennessee: 8-8 (33.04%, 54-1)
- Jacksonville: 6-10 (11.12%, 710-1)
- Indianapolis Colts: 5-11 (4.24%, 1600-1)
AFC West
- San Diego Chargers: 8-8 (40.48%, 40-1)
- Oakland Raiders: 7-9 (26.82%, 77-1)
- Denver Broncos: 7-9 (26.84%, 115-1)
- Kansas City Chiefs: 7-9 (21.52%, 146-1)
NFC East
- Philadelphia Eagles: 9-7 (49.38%, 30-1)
- New York Giants: 8-8 (41.42%, 44-1)
- Dallas Cowboys: 8-8 (41.4%, 35-1)
- Washington Redskins: 7-9 (13.54%, 350-1)
NFC North
- Green Bay: 11-5 (87.42%, 6.7-1)
- Detroit: 9-7 (52.74%, 21-1)
- Chicago: 8-8 (38.22%, 42-1)
- Minnesota: 6-10 (6.7%, 450-1)
NFC South
- New Orleans: 10-6 (75.2%, 9.1-1)
- Atlanta: 9-7 (50.36%, 27-1)
- Carolina: 7-9 (18.08%, 115-1)
- Tampa Bay: 6-10 (3.16%, 2500-1)
NFC West
- San Francisco: 10-6 (75.68%, 9.4-1)
- Seattle: 8-8 (24.26%, 87-1)
- Arizona: 7-9 (20.44%, 103-1)
- St. Louis: 5-11 (2%, 2500-1)
Predicted Playoffs for 2012 Season
AFC
- New England
- Pittsburgh
- Houston
- San Diego
- Baltimore
- Cincinnati
Houston and Baltimore advance out of the wild-card weekend. This creates a New England vs Baltimore match-up, once again demonstrating why it might be better to be the two seed, as Pittsburgh gets a weaker opponent in Houston. New England and Pittsburgh advance with New England representing the AFC in the Super Bowl.
NFC
- Green Bay
- New Orleans
- San Francisco
- Philadelphia
- Detroit
- Atlanta
San Francisco and Detroit advance to the divisional round of the playoffs where San Francisco would play New Orleans in a rematch of a very exciting playoff game from last year. Green Bay beats Detroit and advance to the NFC championship game where they play New Orleans. Green Bay then defeats New Orleans to go to the Super Bowl.
Super Bowl
Green Bay defeats New England in the Super Bowl.
Grantland Newsflash: The old die more often than the young
Grantland recently published this article, Mere Mortals, which claims that:
Baseball players who accrued at least five qualifying seasons from 1959 through 1988 died at a higher rate than similarly experienced football players from the same time frame. The difference between the two is statistically significant6and allows us to reject the null hypothesis; there is a meaningful difference between the mortality rates of baseball players and football players with careers that emulated the [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health] NIOSH criteria.
The authors then go on to collect data on football and baseball players who played at least 5 years between 1959 and 1988, and their results are below:
| Baseball | Football | |
|---|---|---|
| Qualifying Players | 1,494 | 3,088 |
| Alive | 1,256 | 2,694 |
| Deceased | 238 | 394 |
| Mortality Rate | 15.9 percent | 12.8 percent |
From this table, to their credit, they calculated confidence intervals for the mortality rate, as well as performing a fisher exact test to test for independence between the rows (dead or alive) and columns (baseball and football). For football players, the 95% confidence interval for the mortality rate was (11.6, 13.9), and, for baseball players, the 95% confidence interval was (14.1,17.8). The Fisher exact test gives a p-value of about 0.004 and from this they conclude, correctly, that the mortality rate is significantly different between the groups at the 0.01 level.
So, the big question is, as they pose it:
Why is it that baseball players from the ’60s, ’70s, and ’80s are dying more frequently than football players from the same era? Truthfully, as a layman, I can’t say with any certainty, and I don’t think it’s appropriate to speculate. A deeper study into the mortality rates of baseball players that emulated the NIOSH focus on specific causes of death versus the general population might prove valuable.
Well, I’ll “field” (pun intended) this one. Baseball players are dying more often because they are older that football players. The authors, as far as I can tell, never controlled for the age of the players, or any other risk factors for that matter. In 1959, there were, as far as I can tell, 12 NFL teams each with 40 players. That 480 players. In 1988, there were 28 teams with 59 players each; A total of 1652. In baseball, in 1959 there were 16 teams with, let’s use the largest number, 40 man teams, for a total of 640 players. That number in 1988 was 1040 (26 teams with 40 players). So there were almost 3 and half time more players in the NFL in 1988 than there were in 1959. The number of baseball players only increased about 1.6 times over this same period.
These numbers aren’t exact, but the point still stands: The group of football players that has been collected here has a greater proportion of younger people in it than the baseball group. So it’s not exactly apples to apples. In fact, it’s not even close. You’d expect, just based on the ages of the players in these groups for baseball players to have higher rates of mortality than the football players. So basically they have demonstrated that the old die more often than the young.
Cheers.
P.S. My first boss once gave me this example. Remember the ad where it was claimed that 90% of all trucks sold in the last ten years were still on the road? You’re comparing cars that are ten years old in the same group with cars that are less than a year old. Not exactly apples to apples.
Final NFL rankings – 2/9/2012
I was looking back at my NFL rankings over the past few months, and I found something interesting in my week 16 rankings. I actually had the NY Giants ranked higher than San Francisco.
Anyway, below are my final 2011-2012 NFL rankings.
Rankings updated as of 2/9/2012; Records updated as of 2/9/2012; CHFF rankings as of 12/28/2011
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | CHFF Rank |
| Green Bay | 1 | ↑ | 15-2 | 1 |
| New England | 2 | ↓ | 15-4 | 3 |
| Pittsburgh | 3 | – | 12-5 | 6 |
| Baltimore | 4 | – | 13-5 | 5 |
| New Orleans | 5 | ↑ | 14-4 | 2 |
| Atlanta | 6 | ↓ | 10-7 | 11 |
| NY Giants | 7 | ↑↑ | 13-7 | 10 |
| NY Jets | 8 | ↓ | 8-8 | 15 |
| Chicago | 9 | ↓ | 8-8 | 23 |
| San Francisco | 10 | – | 14-4 | 4 |
| Philadelphia | 11 | ↑ | 8-8 | 12 |
| San Diego | 12 | ↑ | 8-8 | 18 |
| Detroit | 13 | ↓↓ | 10-7 | 8 |
| Kansas City | 14 | ↑↑↑ | 7-9 | 26 |
| Oakland | 15 | ↓ | 8-8 | 14 |
| Tennessee | 16 | ↑↑↑↑↑↑ | 9-7 | 20 |
| Tampa Bay | 17 | ↓↓ | 4-12 | 31 |
| Houston | 18 | ↑ | 10-7 | 7 |
| Dallas | 19 | ↑↑ | 8-8 | 13 |
| Miami | 20 | ↓↓ | 6-10 | 22 |
| Seattle | 21 | ↓ | 7-9 | 19 |
| Denver | 22 | ↑↑ | 9-9 | 16 |
| Jacksonville | 23 | ↑↑↑↑↑↑ | 5-11 | 29 |
| Cincinnati | 24 | ↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓ | 9-8 | 9 |
| Indianapolis | 25 | – | 2-14 | 30 |
| Arizona | 26 | ↑↑ | 8-8 | 21 |
| Buffalo | 27 | ↓↓↓↓ | 6-10 | 24 |
| Washington | 28 | ↑↑ | 5-11 | 25 |
| Minnesota | 29 | ↓↓↓ | 3-13 | 28 |
| St. Louis | 30 | ↑↑ | 2-14 | 32 |
| Cleveland | 31 | ↓↓↓↓ | 4-12 | 27 |
| Carolina | 32 | ↓ | 6-10 | 17 |
BCS: My offer still stands…….if you want to contact me you can send me a tweet @StatsInTheWild.
Cheers.