Infiltrated by liberals
My favorite critique of my article from Shark974:
Translation: Deadspin is shit and biased and wants to ban the NFL. Nothing more.
Sorry but you know it’s true. Studies these days are worth the paper they’re printed on, having been infiltrated by liberals (probably a few forests have been sacrificed printing fake global warming studies by liberals).
Also, you go through all that trouble to “prove”, drum roll please, baseball players are “no more likely” to die than FB players.
Hmm, given the notion out there that FB is a deathsport or something, I’d call that alone a big win for the NFL. The way Deadspin chose to spin and headline this article says a lot about their obvious bias. I suspect the author votes for Democrats, as well (liberals are much more likely to be both illogical and extremely biased in conducting studies).
But dont worry, we’ve got liberals on the case, I am sure plenty of fake lies, I mean, scientific studies, are coming soon that prove playing in the NFL rapes your dog and gives you cancer, to be shouted from the rooftops everywhere by the liberal media. Again, look to the global warming precedent.
The more I read this, the more I appreciate what a work of are it really is.
Cheers.
Death Rates: A cautionary note from 1937
The crude death rate, for well known reasons, is not a good measure, because it is quite seriously affected by differences in age composition. Standardized death rates, on the other hand, have the disadvantage that they depend on an arbitrarily selected standard population.
–Dublin, L.I. and Lotka, A.J. “Use of the Life Table in Vital Statistics.” American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 27, May, 1937.
Cheers.
MLB Playoff Probabilities – 9/4/2012
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 4, 2012 at 12:18pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | Projected Record | Prob of making playoffs | SOS | Run Diff |
| Texas | 1 | ↑1 | 80-54 | 95-67 | 99.3% | 11 | +121 |
| NYY | 2 | ↓1 | 76-58 | 90-72 | 87.4% | 6 | +86 |
| Tampa Bay | 3 | – | 74-61 | 87-75 | 43.4% | 7 | +78 |
| Oakland | 4 | ↑1 | 76-58 | 89-73 | 69.2% | 8 | +79 |
| Washington | 5 | ↓1 | 82-52 | 97-65 | 99.9% | 25 | +114 |
| LA Angels | 6 | ↑4 | 72-63 | 84-78 | 7.9% | 5 | +50 |
| Detroit | 7 | ↑2 | 72-62 | 86-76 | 53.8% | 13 | +37 |
| Chi WSox | 8 | ↓1 | 73-61 | 87-75 | 66.2% | 14 | +66 |
| Cincinnati | 9 | ↓1 | 82-54 | 95-67 | 99.9% | 30 | +84 |
| Atlanta | 10 | ↓4 | 76-59 | 89-73 | 96.0% | 22 | +82 |
| Baltimore | 11 | ↑1 | 75-59 | 88-74 | 72.8% | 3 | -31 |
| St. Louis | 12 | ↑1 | 70-64 | 85-77 | 44.5% | 29 | +97 |
| SF | 13 | ↑5 | 77-58 | 90-72 | 96.8% | 26 | +43 |
| Seattle | 14 | ↑1 | 66-70 | 77-85 | 0% | 2 | -9 |
| Boston | 15 | ↓4 |
62-74 | 73-89 | 0% | 4 | -9 |
| LA Dodgers | 16 | – | 73-63 | 85-77 | 34.4% | 24 | +28 |
| Toronto | 17 | ↓3 | 60-74 | 72-90 | 0% | 1 | -41 |
| Arizona | 18 | ↓1 | 66-70 | 76-84 | 0.1% | 23 | +23 |
| Pittsburgh | 19 | – | 70-64 | 84-78 | 27.4% | 28 | +9 |
| NY Mets | 20 | ↑1 | 64-71 | 76-86 | 0.1% | 15 | -28 |
| Philadelphia | 21 | ↑1 |
65-70 | 78-84 | 0% | 20 | -20 |
| Milwaukee | 22 | ↑3 | 65-69 | 77-85 | 0.7% | 27 | +19 |
| Kansas City | 23 | ↓3 | 60-74 | 73-89 | 0% | 12 | -56 |
| San Diego | 24 | ↑3 | 62-74 | 73-89 | 0% | 21 | -56 |
| Minnesota | 25 | – | 55-80 | 67-95 | 0% | 10 | -106 |
| Miami | 26 | – | 60-75 | 71-91 | 0% | 16 | -96 |
| Cleveland | 27 | ↓4 | 57-78 | 68-94 | 0% | 9 | -157 |
| Colorado | 28 | ↑1 | 55-78 | 67-95 | 0% | 18 | -95 |
| Chi Cubs | 29 | ↓1 | 51-83 | 63-99 | 0% | 19 | -115 |
| Houston | 30 | – | 42-93 | 52-110 | 0% | 17 | -197 |
MLB Playoff Probabilities – 9/4/2012
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 4, 2012 at 12:18pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | Projected Record | Prob of making playoffs | SOS | Run Diff |
| Texas | 1 | ↑1 | 80-54 | 95-67 | 99.3% | 11 | +121 |
| NYY | 2 | ↓1 | 76-58 | 90-72 | 87.4% | 6 | +86 |
| Tampa Bay | 3 | – | 74-61 | 87-75 | 43.4% | 7 | +78 |
| Oakland | 4 | ↑1 | 76-58 | 89-73 | 69.2% | 8 | +79 |
| Washington | 5 | ↓1 | 82-52 | 97-65 | 99.9% | 25 | +114 |
| LA Angels | 6 | ↑4 | 72-63 | 84-78 | 7.9% | 5 | +50 |
| Detroit | 7 | ↑2 | 72-62 | 86-76 | 53.8% | 13 | +37 |
| Chi WSox | 8 | ↓1 | 73-61 | 87-75 | 66.2% | 14 | +66 |
| Cincinnati | 9 | ↓1 | 82-54 | 95-67 | 99.9% | 30 | +84 |
| Atlanta | 10 | ↓4 | 76-59 | 89-73 | 96.0% | 22 | +82 |
| Baltimore | 11 | ↑1 | 75-59 | 88-74 | 72.8% | 3 | -31 |
| St. Louis | 12 | ↑1 | 70-64 | 85-77 | 44.5% | 29 | +97 |
| SF | 13 | ↑5 | 77-58 | 90-72 | 96.8% | 26 | +43 |
| Seattle | 14 | ↑1 | 66-70 | 77-85 | 0% | 2 | -9 |
| Boston | 15 | ↓4 | 62-74 | 73-89 | 0% | 4 | -9 |
| LA Dodgers | 16 | – | 73-63 | 85-77 | 34.4% | 24 | +28 |
| Toronto | 17 | ↓3 | 60-74 | 72-90 | 0% | 1 | -41 |
| Arizona | 18 | ↓1 | 66-70 | 76-84 | 0.1% | 23 | +23 |
| Pittsburgh | 19 | – | 70-64 | 84-78 | 27.4% | 28 | +9 |
| NY Mets | 20 | ↑1 | 64-71 | 76-86 | 0.1% | 15 | -28 |
| Philadelphia | 21 | ↑1 | 65-70 | 78-84 | 0% | 20 | -20 |
| Milwaukee | 22 | ↑3 | 65-69 | 77-85 | 0.7% | 27 | +19 |
| Kansas City | 23 | ↓3 | 60-74 | 73-89 | 0% | 12 | -56 |
| San Diego | 24 | ↑3 | 62-74 | 73-89 | 0% | 21 | -56 |
| Minnesota | 25 | – | 55-80 | 67-95 | 0% | 10 | -106 |
| Miami | 26 | – | 60-75 | 71-91 | 0% | 16 | -96 |
| Cleveland | 27 | ↓4 | 57-78 | 68-94 | 0% | 9 | -157 |
| Colorado | 28 | ↑1 | 55-78 | 67-95 | 0% | 18 | -95 |
| Chi Cubs | 29 | ↓1 | 51-83 | 63-99 | 0% | 19 | -115 |
| Houston | 30 | – | 42-93 | 52-110 | 0% | 17 | -197 |
Cheers.
MLB rankings – 9/4/2012
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 4, 2012 at 12:18pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | ESPN | TeamRankings.com | SOS | Run Diff |
| Texas | 1 | ↑1 | 80-54 | 3 | 1 | 11 | +121 |
| NYY | 2 | ↓1 | 76-58 | 4 | 3 | 6 | +86 |
| Tampa Bay | 3 | – | 74-61 | 9 | 5 | 7 | +78 |
| Oakland | 4 | ↑1 | 76-58 | 5 | 2 | 8 | +79 |
| Washington | 5 | ↓1 | 82-52 | 2 | 4 | 25 | +114 |
| LA Angels | 6 | ↑4 | 72-63 | 13 | 7 | 5 | +50 |
| Detroit | 7 | ↑2 | 72-62 | 12 | 9 | 13 | +37 |
| Chi WSox | 8 | ↓1 | 73-61 | 10 | 10 | 14 | +66 |
| Cincinnati | 9 | ↓1 | 82-54 | 1 | 8 | 30 | +84 |
| Atlanta | 10 | ↓4 | 76-59 | 8 | 11 | 22 | +82 |
| Baltimore | 11 | ↑1 | 75-59 | 7 | 6 | 3 | -31 |
| St. Louis | 12 | ↑1 | 70-64 | 11 | 14 | 29 | +97 |
| SF | 13 | ↑5 | 77-58 | 6 | 12 | 26 | +43 |
| Seattle | 14 | ↑1 | 66-70 | 18 | 13 | 2 | -9 |
| Boston | 15 | ↓4 |
62-74 | 21 | 16 | 4 | -9 |
| LA Dodgers | 16 | – | 73-63 | 15 | 15 | 24 | +28 |
| Toronto | 17 | ↓3 | 60-74 | 23 | 17 | 1 | -41 |
| Arizona | 18 | ↓1 | 66-70 | 16 | 21 | 23 | +23 |
| Pittsburgh | 19 | – | 70-64 | 14 | 18 | 28 | +9 |
| NY Mets | 20 | ↑1 | 64-71 | 20 | 22 | 15 | -28 |
| Philadelphia | 21 | ↑1 |
65-70 | 17 | 19 | 20 | -20 |
| Milwaukee | 22 | ↑3 | 65-69 | 19 | 23 | 27 | +19 |
| Kansas City | 23 | ↓3 | 60-74 | 24 | 20 | 12 | -56 |
| San Diego | 24 | ↑3 | 62-74 | 22 | 24 | 21 | -56 |
| Minnesota | 25 | – | 55-80 | 26 | 25 | 10 | -106 |
| Miami | 26 | – | 60-75 | 25 | 27 | 16 | -96 |
| Cleveland | 27 | ↓4 | 57-78 | 28 | 26 | 9 | -157 |
| Colorado | 28 | ↑1 | 55-78 | 27 | 28 | 18 | -95 |
| Chi Cubs | 29 | ↓1 | 51-83 | 29 | 29 | 19 | -115 |
| Houston | 30 | – | 42-93 | 30 | 30 | 17 | -197 |
Past Rankings:
Cheers.
NFL Week 1 predictions
Week 1 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Wednesday @8:30pm
Dallas Cowboys at New York Giants
Prediction: Dallas wins 24-23
Pick: Cowboys +3.5
O/U: Over 47
Sunday @1pm
Indianapolis Colts at Chicago Bears
Prediction: Indianapolis wins 22-21
Pick: Colts +10
O/U: Over 41.5
Philadelphia Eagles at Cleveland Browns
Prediction: Eagles win 24-16
Pick: Eagles -8.5
O/U: Under 41
Buffalo Bills at New York Jets
Prediction: Jets win 23-20
Pick: Jets -3
O/U: Over 41
Washington Redskins at New Orleans Saints
Prediction: Saints win 28-17
Pick: Saints -9.5
O/U: Under 49.5
New England Patriots at Tennessee Titans
Prediction: Patriots win 27-20
Pick: Patriots -6.5
O/U: Under 47.5
Jacksonville Jaguars at Minnesota Vikings
Prediction: Vikings win 23-20
Pick: Jaguars +4.5
O/U: Over 38
Miami Dolphins at Houston Texans
Prediction: Texans win 23-21
Pick: Dolphins +9.5
O/U: Over 43
St. Louis Rams at Detroit Lions
Prediction: Lions win 21-16
Pick: Rams +9
O/U: Under 46.5
Atlanta Falcons at Kansas City Chiefs
Prediction: Falcons win 24-17
Pick: Falcons -1
O/U: Under 41.5
Sunday @4:25pm
Seattle Seahawks at Arizona Cardinals
Prediction: Cardinals win 22-19
Pick: Cardinals +1.5
O/U: Under 40.5
San Francisco 49ers at Green Bay Packers
Prediction: Packers wins 27-19
Pick: Packers -5.5
O/U: Over 45
Carolina Panthers at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Prediction: Panthers wins 21-20
Pick: Buccaneers +2.5
O/U: Under 46.5
Sunday @8:20
Pittsburgh Steelers at Denver Broncos
Prediction: Steelers win 23-20
Pick: Steelers Even
O/U: Under 44
Monday @7pm
Cincinnati Bengals at Baltimore Ravens
Prediction: Ravens win 23-18
Pick: Bengals +6
O/U: Over 40.5
Monday @10:15pm
San Diego Chargers at Oakland Raiders
Prediction: Chargers win 27-19
Pick: Chargers -1.5
O/U: Under 47.5
Cheers.
NFL preview
Season Preview
It’s almost here! Another season of grown men smashing their brains together for our entertainment. And entertained we will be.
So, let’s start at the end: which teams are most likely to be suffering life-lengthening (Not really) massive head injuries in February 2013 in New Orleans? I’m once again making a not so bold prediction and taking Green Bay over New England in the Super Bowl this year.
Some Comments
AFC
East
New England has the easier road to New Orleans of the two by playing the softest regular season schedule of any team this year. For starters, they play in the AFC east which features Buffalo, Miami, and the New York Jets. None of those teams had winning records last year, and they all failed to make the playoffs. The Patriots then go on to play the AFC South and the NFC West. The teams in these two divisions had a combined record of 56-72 last year. In fact, they play only 3 games all of 2012 against teams that had winning records in 2011. If they beat baltimore in week 3, they could very reasonably be 8-0 at their bye week. If they start the first half of their season any worse than 6-2, it’s a disaster.
The Jets, Dolphins, and Bills are good teams, but none of them are very good teams. They all get screwed annually by having to play New England twice every single year.
North
I always feel bad for the wild card team that always seems to come out of this division. You win 11+games and, not only do you not get a bye week, you have to go ON THE ROAD to play some crap team from the AFC west after they “earned” home field advantage. (What I’m saying is that Pittsburgh should not have had to go to Denver last year.)
I think Pittsburgh wins this division in a close race by either one game or in a tie-breaker with Baltimore. The season’s biggest game outside the division is Baltimore’s game against New England. Pittsburgh avoids having to play the Patriots this year and that might just be enough to get them the division title.
South
Texans.
West
Any of these teams has a legitimate shot to limp to a division title and playoff game (at home!). I think San Diego wins it this year thanks to a much, much easier schedule than division foe Denver, who is the most likely team to challenge for the division. Denver’s first 8 opponents all had at least 8 wins last year, and six of those 8 went to the playoffs. Good luck Peyton. Any of the four teams could realistically win this division, and there is a chance they could do it 2010 Seattle Seahawks style. The AFC West drew the AFC North and the NFC South this year on their schedule. So they’ll have to play Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Cincinnati, New Orleans and Atlanta: All 2011 playoff teams. At least they all get to console themselves with the statement “Hey, at least we get to play [Insert AFC West team] twice”. My dream is to see a team a 6-10 team make the playoffs and this year’s schedule and division of mediocrity are certainly keeping my hopes alive.
NFC
East
New York, Dallas, or Philadelphia has a real chance to win this division this year, but I think the Eagles get it done. I thought the Eagles were the best team in this division last year, and I think they’re the best team in the division again. It also helps that they have the easiest schedule of any of the teams that have a legitimate chance to win the division (Washington does not).
North
Green Bay wins the division by at least two games. The interesting question is who finishes second. I’m taking Detroit as runner-up and earning a wild card spot and 5th seed in the NFC.
South
I think New Orleans is going to win this division again, but Atlanta will make it close. I’ll pick Atlanta to get the second wild card because I have to pick someone. But there are at least 6 other teams that have a real shot at it (New York, Dallas, Chicago, Carolina, Seattle, Arizona).
West
San Francisco is too talented to not win this division again, but I think it’ll be a lot closer than a lot of people are making it out to be. I think the real question in this division is can two teams get to the playoffs. Two years ago, this division was been all-time bad (they sent a 7-9 team to the playoffs!), but it was much more competitive in 2011.
Seattle has 11 games in 2012 against teams that were 8-8 or worse in 2011. If they can manage a winning record in those 11 games and pick up a few quality wins they can make a nice little run at the wildcard, but their going to have to earn it. They aren’t getting into the playoffs this year thanks to an easy schedule. They play San Francisco in Seattle on December 23 and could prove to be a critical game for both teams.
Arizona also has a very difficult schedule. They play games at New England, at Green Bay, at Atlanta, and at San Francisco. I’d be surprised if they won any of these games, and I’d be stunned if they won 2 or more. Unfortunately, this tough schedule probably leaves them out of the playoffs.
2012 Pre-Season Rankings
| Team | Rank | Ex W | SOS | SB Odds | WSEX odds | 2011 Wins |
| Green Bay | 1 | 11.17 | 23 | 6.7-1 | 6-1 | 15 |
| New England | 2 | 10.68 | 32 | 7.7-1 | 7-1 | 13 |
| New Orleans | 3 | 10.47 | 24 | 9.1-1 | 15-1 | 13 |
| San Francisco | 4 | 10.18 | 10 | 9.4-1 | 13-1 | 13 |
| Baltimore | 5 | 9.73 | 7 | 11.5-1 | 17-1 | 12 |
| Pittsburgh | 6 | 9.85 | 22 | 15.3-1 | 15-1 | 12 |
| Detroit | 7 | 9.15 | 12 | 21-1 | 30-1 | 10 |
| Houston | 8 | 9.15 | 29 | 18-1 | 10-1 | 10 |
| Atlanta | 9 | 9.00 | 30 | 27-1 | 25-1 | 10 |
| Philadelphia | 10 | 8.56 | 11 | 30-1 | 12-1 | 8 |
| Cincinnati | 11 | 8.54 | 19 | 38-1 | 45-1 | 9 |
| New York (G) | 12 | 8.01 | 1 | 44-1 | 17-1 | 9 |
| Chicago | 13 | 8.31 | 13 | 42-1 | 23-1 | 8 |
| San Diego | 14 | 8.44 | 26 | 40-1 | 25-1 | 8 |
| New York (J) | 15 | 8.09 | 15 | 54-1 | 32-1 | 8 |
| Seattle | 16 | 7.91 | 5 | 87-1 | 65-1 | 7 |
| Tennessee | 17 | 8.06 | 18 | 54-1 | 90-1 | 9 |
| Dallas | 18 | 7.85 | 6 | 35-1 | 25-1 | 8 |
| Miami | 19 | 7.79 | 21 | 53-1 | 110-1 | 6 |
| Arizona | 20 | 7.33 | 2 | 103-1 | 80-1 | 8 |
| Denver | 21 | 7.25 | 4 | 115-1 | 20-1 | 8 |
| Oakland | 22 | 7.49 | 27 | 77-1 | 100-1 | 8 |
| Carolina | 23 | 7.35 | 20 | 115-1 | 45-1 | 6 |
| Buffalo | 24 | 7.24 | 28 | 142-1 | 65-1 | 6 |
| Kansas City | 25 | 7.01 | 31 | 146-1 | 50-1 | 7 |
| Washington | 26 | 6.52 | 17 | 350-1 | 70-1 | 5 |
| Jacksonville | 27 | 6.41 | 14 | 710-1 | 160-1 | 5 |
| Cleveland | 28 | 6.17 | 8 | 1000-1 | 200-1 | 4 |
| Minnesota | 29 | 6.20 | 9 | 4501-1 | 180-1 | 3 |
| Tampa Bay | 30 | 5.70 | 25 | 2500-1 | 100-1 | 4 |
| St. Louis | 31 | 5.17 | 3 | 2500-1 | 110-1 | 2 |
| Indianapolis | 32 | 5.22 | 16 | 1600-1 | 120-1 | 2 |
Ex W – Average number of wins a team would have if the season was played 100,000 times.
SOS (Strength of schedule) – The average of the strength coefficients for each opponent on a team’s schedule.
SB Odds – SITW estimated odds that the team wins the Super Bowl
WSEX Odds – http://www.wsex.com odds to win Super Bowl
Predicted Standings for 2012 Season
Team: Predicted Record (Prob Make Playoffs, Super Bowl Wins Odds)
AFC East
- New England Patriots: 11-5 (85.44%, 7.7-1)
- New York Jets: 8-8 (37.3%, 54-1)
- Miami Dolphins: 8-8 (34.84%, 53-1)
- Buffalo Bills: 7-9 (26.38%, 142-1)
AFC North
- Pittsburgh Steelers: 10-6 (65.96%, 15.3-1)
- Baltimore Ravens: 10-6 (68.52%, 11.5-1)
- Cincinnati Bengals: 9-7 (41.86%, 38-1)
- Cleveland Browns: 6-10 (7.1%, 1000-1)
AFC South
- Houston: 9-7 (68.54%, 18-1)
- Tennessee: 8-8 (33.04%, 54-1)
- Jacksonville: 6-10 (11.12%, 710-1)
- Indianapolis Colts: 5-11 (4.24%, 1600-1)
AFC West
- San Diego Chargers: 8-8 (40.48%, 40-1)
- Oakland Raiders: 7-9 (26.82%, 77-1)
- Denver Broncos: 7-9 (26.84%, 115-1)
- Kansas City Chiefs: 7-9 (21.52%, 146-1)
NFC East
- Philadelphia Eagles: 9-7 (49.38%, 30-1)
- New York Giants: 8-8 (41.42%, 44-1)
- Dallas Cowboys: 8-8 (41.4%, 35-1)
- Washington Redskins: 7-9 (13.54%, 350-1)
NFC North
- Green Bay: 11-5 (87.42%, 6.7-1)
- Detroit: 9-7 (52.74%, 21-1)
- Chicago: 8-8 (38.22%, 42-1)
- Minnesota: 6-10 (6.7%, 450-1)
NFC South
- New Orleans: 10-6 (75.2%, 9.1-1)
- Atlanta: 9-7 (50.36%, 27-1)
- Carolina: 7-9 (18.08%, 115-1)
- Tampa Bay: 6-10 (3.16%, 2500-1)
NFC West
- San Francisco: 10-6 (75.68%, 9.4-1)
- Seattle: 8-8 (24.26%, 87-1)
- Arizona: 7-9 (20.44%, 103-1)
- St. Louis: 5-11 (2%, 2500-1)
Predicted Playoffs for 2012 Season
AFC
- New England
- Pittsburgh
- Houston
- San Diego
- Baltimore
- Cincinnati
Houston and Baltimore advance out of the wild-card weekend. This creates a New England vs Baltimore match-up, once again demonstrating why it might be better to be the two seed, as Pittsburgh gets a weaker opponent in Houston. New England and Pittsburgh advance with New England representing the AFC in the Super Bowl.
NFC
- Green Bay
- New Orleans
- San Francisco
- Philadelphia
- Detroit
- Atlanta
San Francisco and Detroit advance to the divisional round of the playoffs where San Francisco would play New Orleans in a rematch of a very exciting playoff game from last year. Green Bay beats Detroit and advance to the NFC championship game where they play New Orleans. Green Bay then defeats New Orleans to go to the Super Bowl.
Super Bowl
Green Bay defeats New England in the Super Bowl.
If you haven’t yet discovered the competitive machine learning site kaggle.com, please do so now. I’ll wait.
Great – so, you checked it out, fell in love and have made it back. I recently downloaded the data for the getting started competition. It consists of 42000 labelled images (28×28) of hand written digits 0-9. The competition is a straight forward supervised learning problem of OCR (Optical Character Recognition). There are two sample R scripts on the site to get you started. They implement the k-nearest neighbours and Random Forest algorithms.
I wanted to get started by visualizing all of the training data by rendering some sort of an average of each character. Visualizing the data is a great first step to developing a model. Here’s how I did it:
Which gives you:
Notice the wobbly looking ‘1’. You can see that there is some variance in the angle of…
View original post 127 more words
Presidential Candidates, Search Engine Auto-Complete, and Word Clouds: Bicycles, Unicorns, and American Presidential Politics
Finally, I’ve managed to post something that’s not about @BillBarnwell‘s flawed “study” titled “Mere Mortals” (Here’s why he’s wrong. Here is what happens when I apply his logic to something else….you get non-sense). Anyway, here is an update to the presidential candidates search engine auto-complete word clouds (The original post and description of how the data is collected and processed is here).
According to search engines Obama is a gay, socialist/communist, muslim terrorist version of the Antichrist (or possible, not even living thing, but a bicycle), and Romney is an idiot, douche bag, ass hole, mormon unicorn that lies.
Cheers.


