Category Archives: Sports
NFL Rankings – 9/25/2012
Note: I’ve stopped using data from 2011, so these new rankings reflect only 2012 data.
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 25, 2012 at 6:10pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | ESPN | TeamRankings.com | SOS | Points Diff |
| Arizona | 1 | ↑12 | 3-0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | +27 |
| Houston | 2 | ↑5 | 3-0 | 1 | 3 | 16 | +46 |
| Atlanta | 3 | ↑5 | 3-0 | 2 | 2 | 31 | +46 |
| Seattle | 4 | ↑10 | 2-1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | +18 |
| Chicago | 5 | ↑10 | 2-1 | 11 | 18 | 9 | +24 |
| San Francisco | 6 | ↓5 | 2-1 | 4 | 10 | 4 | +5 |
| Minnesota | 7 | ↑20 | 2-1 | 21 | 20 | 11 | +11 |
| New England | 8 | ↓5 | 1-2 | 8 | 7 | 7 | +18 |
| Baltimore | 9 | ↓5 | 2-1 | 3 | 4 | 25 | +31 |
| NY Jets | 10 | ↑7 | 2-1 | 17 | 11 | 8 | +6 |
| NY Giants | 11 | ↑2 | 2-1 | 6 | 8 | 22 | +29 |
| Buffalo | 12 | ↑11 | 2-1 | 19 | 15 | 13 | +8 |
| Green Bay | 13 | ↓11 | 1-2 | 7 | 14 | 6 | +3 |
| Dallas | 14 | ↑5 | 2-1 | 12 | 9 | 18 | -7 |
| Miami | 15 | ↑5 | 1-2 | 29 | 19 | 10 | -1 |
| Detroit | 16 | ↓7 | 1-2 | 18 | 25 | 2 | -7 |
| San Diego | 17 | ↓7 | 2-1 | 13 | 13 | 32 | +12 |
| St. Louis | 18 | ↑13 | 1-2 | 25 | 29 | 1 | -18 |
| Jacksonville | 19 | ↑11 | 1-2 | 30 | 22 | 14 | -18 |
| Philadelphia | 20 | ↓9 | 2-1 | 9 | 6 | 17 | -19 |
| Cincinnati | 21 | ↓5 | 2-1 | 15 | 12 | 27 | -17 |
| Denver | 22 | ↓4 | 1-2 | 14 | 16 | 28 | 0 |
| Pittsburgh | 23 | ↓18 | 1-2 | 16 | 17 | 26 | +2 |
| Washington | 24 | – | 1-2 | 22 | 27 | 19 | -2 |
| Indianapolis | 25 | ↑7 | 1-2 | 31 | 30 | 15 | -22 |
| Tampa Bay | 26 | ↑2 | 1-2 | 20 | 26 | 24 | -7 |
| Tennessee | 27 | ↓5 | 1-2 | 24 | 23 | 12 | -46 |
| Carolina | 28 | ↓7 | 1-2 | 23 | 28 | 21 | -27 |
| Kansas City | 29 | ↓3 | 1-2 | 26 | 21 | 29 | -31 |
| Oakland | 30 | ↓5 | 1-2 | 27 | 24 | 30 | -27 |
| Cleveland | 31 | ↓2 | 0-3 | 32 | 32 | 23 | -18 |
| New Orleans | 32 | ↓26 | 0-3 | 28 | 31 | 20 | -19 |
NCAA College Football Rankings – September 24, 2012
|
NFL Week 3 Predictions
Overall Records for 2012
SU: 27-21 (56.25%)
ATS: 27-21 (56.25%)
O/U: 25-23 (52.08%)
Week 3 (5-11 SU, 9-7 ATS, 9-7 OU)
Week 2 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Week 1 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Thursday @8:20pm
New York Giants at Carolina Panthers
Prediction: Panthers win 27-26
Pick: Panthers +1.5
O/U: Over 49.5
Sunday @1pm
Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Dallas Cowboys
Prediction: Cowboys win 24-20
Pick: Buccaneers +8
O/U: Under 46
New York Jets at Miami Dolphins
Prediction: Dolphins win 22-21
Pick: Dolphins +3.5
O/U: Over 40
Kansas City Chiefs at New Orleans Saints
Prediction: Saints win 34-18
Pick: Saints -9
O/U: Under 54
Cincinnati Bengals at Washington Redskins
Prediction: Bengals 20-16
Pick: Bengals +4.5
O/U: Under 49
Detroit Lions at Tennessee Titans
Prediction: Lions win 25-21
Pick: Lions -3.5
O/U: Under 47
San Francisco 49ers at Minnesota Vikings
Prediction: 49ers win 24-20
Pick: Vikings +7.5
O/U: Over 43
Jacksonville Jaguars at Indianapolis Colts
Prediction: Colts win 20-14
Pick: Colts -2.5
O/U: Under 42
St. Louis Rams at Chicago Bears
Prediction: Bears win 23-15
Pick: Rams +9
O/U: Under 44.5
Buffalo Bills at Cleveland Browns
Prediction: Bills 23-18
Pick: Bills -3
O/U: Under 44
Sunday @4:05pm
Atlanta Falcons at San Diego Chargers
Prediction: Chargers 26-25
Pick: Falcons +3.5
O/U: Over 47.5
Philadelphia Eagles at Arizona Cardinals
Prediction: Eagles 28-23
Pick: Eagles -3.5
O/U: Over 43.5
Sunday @4:25pm
Pittsburgh Steelers at Oakland Raiders
Prediction: Steelers 24-23
Pick: Raiders +4.5
O/U: Over 44.5
Houston Texans at Denver Broncos
Prediction: Texans win 25-21
Pick: Texans -2
O/U: Over 44.5
Sunday @8:20
New England Patriots at Baltimore Ravens
Prediction: Patriots win 29-22
Pick: Patriots +3.5
O/U: Over 48.5
Monday @8:30pm
Green Bay Packers at Seattle Seahawks
Prediction: Packers win 29-19
Pick: Packers -3.5
O/U: Over 47
MLB Playoff Probabilities – 9/18/2012
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 18, 2012 at 12:18pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | Projected Record | Prob Make Playoffs | SOS | Run Diff |
| Texas | 1 | – | 87-59 | 95-67 | 99.9% | 11 | +123 |
| NYY | 2 | – | 83-63 | 91-71 | 98.0% | 5 | +97 |
| Washington | 3 | ↑1 | 89-57 | 98-64 | 99.9% | 25 | +128 |
| Oakland | 4 | ↑1 | 84-62 | 90-72 | 88.2% | 8 | +80 |
| LA Angels | 5 | ↑1 | 80-67 | 86-76 | 8.5% | 6 | +70 |
| Tampa Bay | 6 | ↓3 | 78-69 | 84-78 | 1.3% | 7 | +71 |
| Chi WSox | 7 | ↑1 | 80-66 | 88-74 | 88.2% | 14 | +76 |
| Baltimore | 8 | ↑1 | 83-64 | 90-72 | 92.5% | 4 | -14 |
| Detroit | 9 | ↑2 | 77-69 | 86-76 | 23.3% | 13 | +38 |
| Atlanta | 10 | ↓3 | 85-63 | 92-70 | 99.9% | 20 | +84 |
| Cincinnati | 11 | ↓1 | 88-59 | 96-66 | 99.9% | 30 | +78 |
| SF | 12 | – | 84-63 | 91-71 | 99.9% | 26 | +46 |
| St. Louis | 13 | – | 77-70 | 83-79 | 47.1% | 29 | +83 |
| Toronto | 14 | ↑1 | 66-79 | 73-89 | 0% | 1 | -37 |
| Boston | 15 | ↑1 | 67-81 | 73-89 | 0% | 3 | -19 |
| Seattle | 16 | ↓2 | 70-78 | 75-87 | 0% | 2 | -35 |
| LA Dodgers | 17 | – | 76-71 | 82-80 | 21.6% | 23 | +16 |
| Arizona | 18 | – | 72-74 | 78-84 | 0.3% | 24 | +30 |
| Milwaukee | 19 | ↑2 | 74-72 | 81-81 | 14.3% | 28 | +41 |
| Philadelphia | 20 | ↓1 | 74-74 | 81-81 | 6.1% | 21 | -6 |
| Kansas City | 21 | ↑1 |
66-80 | 73-89 | 0% | 12 | -43 |
| Pittsburgh | 22 | ↓1 | 74-72 | 81-81 | 10.6% | 27 | -4 |
| San Diego | 23 | ↑1 | 71-76 | 77-85 | 0% | 22 | -38 |
| NY Mets | 24 | ↓1 | 66-81 | 73-89 | 0% | 15 | -52 |
| Miami | 25 | ↑1 | 65-83 | 71-91 | 0% | 16 | -93 |
| Minnesota | 26 | ↓1 | 60-87 | 66-96 | 0% | 10 | -120 |
| Cleveland | 27 | – | 61-86 | 67-95 | 0% | 9 | -179 |
| Colorado | 28 | – | 58-88 | 65-97 | 0% | 17 | -101 |
| Chi Cubs | 29 | – | 58-89 | 63-99 | 0% | 19 | -114 |
| Houston | 30 | – | 48-99 | 53-109 | 0% | 18 | -206 |
Cheers.
MLB Rankings – 9/18/2012
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 18, 2012 at 12:18pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | ESPN | TeamRankings.com | SOS | Run Diff |
| Texas | 1 | – | 87-59 | 1 | 1 | 11 | +123 |
| NYY | 2 | – | 83-63 | 7 | 3 | 5 | +97 |
| Washington | 3 | ↑1 | 89-57 | 2 | 5 | 25 | +128 |
| Oakland | 4 | ↑1 | 84-62 | 4 | 2 | 8 | +80 |
| LA Angels | 5 | ↑1 | 80-67 | 9 | 6 | 6 | +70 |
| Tampa Bay | 6 | ↓3 | 78-69 | 11 | 7 | 7 | +71 |
| Chi WSox | 7 | ↑1 | 80-66 | 10 | 9 | 14 | +76 |
| Baltimore | 8 | ↑1 | 83-64 | 8 | 4 | 4 | -14 |
| Detroit | 9 | ↑2 | 77-69 | 12 | 11 | 13 | +38 |
| Atlanta | 10 | ↓3 | 85-63 | 6 | 8 | 20 | +84 |
| Cincinnati | 11 | ↓1 | 88-59 | 3 | 10 | 30 | +78 |
| SF | 12 | – | 84-63 | 5 | 12 | 26 | +46 |
| St. Louis | 13 | – | 77-70 | 13 | 14 | 29 | +83 |
| Toronto | 14 | ↑1 | 66-79 | 24 | 15 | 1 | -37 |
| Boston | 15 | ↑1 | 67-81 | 23 | 17 | 3 | -19 |
| Seattle | 16 | ↓2 | 70-78 | 20 | 13 | 2 | -35 |
| LA Dodgers | 17 | – | 76-71 | 14 | 18 | 23 | +16 |
| Arizona | 18 | – | 72-74 | 17 | 19 | 24 | +30 |
| Milwaukee | 19 | ↑2 | 74-72 | 16 | 21 | 28 | +41 |
| Philadelphia | 20 | ↓1 | 74-74 | 15 | 16 | 21 | -6 |
| Kansas City | 21 | ↑1 |
66-80 | 22 | 20 | 12 | -43 |
| Pittsburgh | 22 | ↓1 | 74-72 | 18 | 23 | 27 | -4 |
| San Diego | 23 | ↑1 | 71-76 | 19 | 22 | 22 | -38 |
| NY Mets | 24 | ↓1 | 66-81 | 21 | 24 | 15 | -52 |
| Miami | 25 | ↑1 | 65-83 | 25 | 26 | 16 | -93 |
| Minnesota | 26 | ↓1 | 60-87 | 26 | 26 | 10 | -120 |
| Cleveland | 27 | – | 61-86 | 27 | 27 | 9 | -179 |
| Colorado | 28 | – | 58-88 | 28 | 28 | 17 | -101 |
| Chi Cubs | 29 | – | 58-89 | 29 | 29 | 19 | -114 |
| Houston | 30 | – | 48-99 | 30 | 30 | 18 | -206 |
Yunel Escobar, Homosexual Slurs, and the 2008 Presidential Election
I just came across this poll question on ESPN about people’s opinions regarding the Yunel Escobar’s suspension, and I couldn’t help but notice that this map (below) look very similar to the 2008 presidential election map. I suppose you could view the map below as essentially serving as a state by state snap shot of how residents (well residents who read ESPN.com and vote in their polls) feel about homosexual slurs. Take a look at this map:
Now take a look at this map that shows which states voted for McCain and Obama in the 2008 presidential election:
The similarities are striking. The states that judge the punishment to be too harsh, the blue states in ESPN’s map, align very strongly with red states in the presidential map. Similarly, the green (Too lenient) and red (Just right) states align very closely with the blue states in the presidential election map. All six of the green states voted for Obama in the last election with the exception of South Dakota. Of the red states in the ESPN map only Montana, North Dakota West Virginia went for McCain in 2008. Likewise, of the blue states in the ESPN map only Indiana, North Carolina, and Florida went for Obama. Finally, here is a two by two table with a break down of the relationship between Yunel Escobar opinions and presidential states. (The p-value for the fisher test of independence between rows and columns is 8.213e-07). So, it seems there is a significant association between how people feel about Yunel Escobar’s suspension for using a gay slur and how that state voted in the 2008 presidential election.
Cheers.
NFL Rankings – Week 3
StatsInTheWild MLB rankings as of September 18, 2012 at 6:10pm. SOS=strength of schedule
| Team | Rank | Change | Record | ESPN | TeamRankings.com | SOS | Points Diff |
| San Francisco | 1 | ↑1 | 2-0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | +16 |
| Green Bay | 2 | ↓1 | 1-1 | 4 | 13 | 23 | +5 |
| New England | 3 | – | 1-1 | 5 | 7 | 32 | +19 |
| Baltimore | 4 | – | 1-1 | 6 | 6 | 7 | +30 |
| Pittsburgh | 5 | ↑1 | 1-1 | 9 | 12 | 22 | +5 |
| New Orleans | 6 | ↓1 | 0-2 | 24 | 23 | 24 | -16 |
| Houston | 7 | ↑2 | 2-0 | 2 | 10 | 29 | +40 |
| Atlanta | 8 | – | 2-0 | 3 | 9 | 30 | +22 |
| Detroit | 9 | ↓2 | 1-1 | 13 | 14 | 12 | -4 |
| San Diego | 10 | ↑2 | 2-0 | 11 | 11 | 26 | +36 |
| Philadelphia | 11 | ↓1 | 2-0 | 7 | 4 | 11 | +2 |
| Arizona | 12 | ↑5 | 2-0 | 14 | 1 | 2 | +6 |
| NY Giants | 13 | ↑2 | 1-1 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Seattle | 14 | ↑5 | 1-1 | 17 | 3 | 5 | +16 |
| Chicago | 15 | ↓4 | 1-1 | 12 | 21 | 13 | +7 |
| Cincinnati | 16 | ↑2 | 1-1 | 16 | 17 | 19 | -24 |
| NY Jets | 17 | ↓4 | 1-1 | 18 | 20 | 15 | +3 |
| Denver | 18 | ↓2 | 1-1 | 10 | 16 | 4 | +6 |
| Dallas | 19 | ↓5 | 1-1 | 15 | 5 | 6 | -13 |
| Miami | 20 | ↑3 | 1-1 | 25 | 18 | 21 | +2 |
| Carolina | 21 | ↑3 | 1-1 | 19 | 22 | 20 | +2 |
| Tennessee | 22 | ↓2 | 0-2 | 26 | 27 | 18 | -49 |
| Buffalo | 23 | ↑3 | 1-1 | 22 | 25 | 28 | -2 |
| Washington | 24 | ↓2 | 1-1 | 20 | 15 | 17 | +5 |
| Oakland | 25 | ↓4 | 0-2 | 30 | 28 | 27 | -30 |
| Kansas City | 26 | ↓1 | 0-2 | 28 | 30 | 31 | -34 |
| Minnesota | 27 | – | 1-1 | 29 | 31 | 9 | 0 |
| Tampa Bay | 28 | – | 1-1 | 21 | 24 | 25 | -1 |
| Cleveland | 29 | ↑1 | 0-2 | 32 | 26 | 8 | -8 |
| Jacksonville | 30 | ↓1 | 0-2 | 31 | 32 | 14 | -23 |
| St. Louis | 31 | – | 1-1 | 23 | 19 | 3 | -1 |
| Indianapolis | 32 | – | 1-1 | 27 | 29 | 16 | -17 |
Cheers.
Going for 2
Update: Apparently, it seems, I am completely wrong about this, and that it is well established that a team should go for two earlier. Via Twitter, @bdoc87 points to the book “Mathletics” where they suggest going to two in this situation as early as the second quarter. There is also this chart, which says that you should go for two at any point in the second half if you are down 9 after scoring a touchdown.
Here is an article by Chase Stuart from www.footballperspective.com with the title “Trailing by 15 in the middle of the 4th quarter, teams are foolish to not go for 2 after touchdowns”. They are arguing, as stated in the title of the article, that if a team is down by 15 in the middle of the final quarter and they score a touchdown (cutting the lead to 9), that they should go for two in an attempt to cut the lead to 7 rather than take the extra point and cut the lead to 8. This is a fair argument and the author may well be correct, but they seem to offer absolutely no evidence that this is the correct decision. For instance, the author states:
If you are going to convert the 2-point attempt, it doesn’t matter all that much whether you go for it early or late. If you’re going to miss it, going for it earlier significantly improves your odds of pulling off a miraculous comeback, precisely because you’re [sic] got almost no chance if you miss it late.
The author first notes that it doesn’t really matter whether you go for the 2 points early or late if you are going to convert it. Sure fine, I’ll agree with that. But then in the next sentence argues that “going for it earlier significantly improves your odds of pulling off a miraculous comeback”. Is this true? It may well be, but I see nothing in the article that even remotely supports this point. It seems to just be stated as fact with no supporting evidence. I am gonna need more proof than this. Ideally, one would look to collect actual data on this, and try to compare the two decisions. However, it seems like football coaches almost always go for one, so a simulation study may be better here. Make some assumptions, develop a model for a football game, and simulate this scenario say 10000 times going for the extra point and 10000 times going for 2. Then you can estimate the probabilities of a win and say a team will win X percent of the time going for 1 and Y percent of the time going to 2. I suspect there probably really isn’t much of a difference at all, but I have no evidence for or against this point. It’s simply my opinion. It looks to me like this entire article is stating a hypothesis (going for two is better than going for one), and that it is the authors opinion that going for two is better than going for one. However, they seem to offer no evidence at all in support of their claims. Although maybe I am missing something.
Go Falcons!
Cheers.
NCAA Football Rankings – 9/17/2012
NCAA Football Rankings after week 3 as of 9/17/2012 at 6:13am
Rank |
Team |
Record |
| 1 | TEXAS | 3-0 |
| 2 | TEXAS TECH | 3-0 |
| 3 | KANSAS STATE | 3-0 |
| 4 | ALABAMA | 3-0 |
| 5 | LSU | 3-0 |
| 6 | IOWA STATE | 3-0 |
| 7 | ARIZONA | 3-0 |
| 8 | STANFORD | 3-0 |
| 9 | OKLAHOMA | 2-0 |
| 10 | TCU | 2-0 |
| 11 | WEST VIRGINIA | 2-0 |
| 12 | BAYLOR | 2-0 |
| 13 | GEORGIA | 3-0 |
| 14 | SO CAROLINA | 3-0 |
| 15 | NOTRE DAME | 3-0 |
| 16 | OREGON | 3-0 |
| 17 | FLORIDA | 3-0 |
| 18 | OKLAHOMA STATE | 2-1 |
| 19 | UCLA | 3-0 |
| 20 | USC | 2-1 |
| 21 | MISS STATE | 3-0 |
| 22 | OREGON STATE | 1-0 |
| 23 | OHIO STATE | 3-0 |
| 24 | ARIZONA STATE | 2-1 |
| 25 | NORTHWESTERN | 3-0 |
| 26 | FLORIDA STATE | 3-0 |
| 27 | CLEMSON | 3-0 |
| 28 | TEXAS A&M | 1-1 |
| 29 | NEBRASKA | 2-1 |
| 30 | LOUISVILLE | 3-0 |
| 31 | CINCINNATI | 2-0 |
| 32 | MICHIGAN | 2-1 |
| 33 | MISSOURI | 2-1 |
| 34 | KANSAS | 1-2 |
| 35 | GEORGIA TECH | 2-1 |
| 36 | WASHINGTON | 2-1 |
| 37 | TENNESSEE | 2-1 |
| 38 | MINNESOTA | 3-0 |
| 39 | OLE MISS | 2-1 |
| 40 | BYU | 2-1 |
| 41 | MICHIGAN STATE | 2-1 |
| 42 | UTAH | 2-1 |
| 43 | RUTGERS | 3-0 |
| 44 | PURDUE | 2-1 |
| 45 | MARYLAND | 2-1 |
| 46 | WISCONSIN | 2-1 |
| 47 | NC STATE | 2-1 |
| 48 | IOWA | 2-1 |
| 49 | CONNECTICUT | 2-1 |
| 50 | WASHINGTON ST | 2-1 |
| 51 | KENTUCKY | 1-2 |
| 52 | MIAMI-FLORIDA | 2-1 |
| 53 | LOUISIANA TECH | 2-0 |
| 54 | INDIANA | 2-1 |
| 55 | FRESNO STATE | 2-1 |
| 56 | SAN JOSE ST | 2-1 |
| 57 | PITTSBURGH | 1-2 |
| 58 | CALIFORNIA | 1-2 |
| 59 | ILLINOIS | 2-1 |
| 60 | MIDDLE TENNESSEE | 2-1 |
| 61 | OHIO U | 3-0 |
| 62 | AUBURN | 1-2 |
| 63 | UTAH STATE | 2-1 |
| 64 | PENN STATE | 1-2 |
| 65 | ARKANSAS | 1-2 |
| 66 | SYRACUSE | 1-2 |
| 67 | DUKE | 2-1 |
| 68 | SO FLORIDA | 2-1 |
| 69 | NEVADA | 2-1 |
| 70 | VANDERBILT | 1-2 |
| 71 | VIRGINIA TECH | 2-1 |
| 72 | SAN DIEGO ST | 2-1 |
| 73 | BOISE STATE | 1-1 |
| 74 | TOLEDO | 2-1 |
| 75 | UCF | 2-1 |
| 76 | TEMPLE | 1-1 |
| 77 | TX-SAN ANTONIO | 3-0 |
| 78 | VIRGINIA | 2-1 |
| 79 | TULSA | 2-1 |
| 80 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 1-2 |
| 81 | TEXAS STATE | 1-1 |
| 82 | WAKE FOREST | 2-1 |
| 83 | NORTH CAROLINA | 1-2 |
| 84 | ULM | 1-1 |
| 85 | COLORADO | 0-3 |
| 86 | BALL STATE | 2-1 |
| 87 | LOUISIANA | 2-1 |
| 88 | COLORADO STATE | 1-2 |
| 89 | WESTERN KY | 2-1 |
| 90 | WYOMING | 0-3 |
| 91 | UNLV | 0-3 |
| 92 | HAWAII | 1-1 |
| 93 | NEW MEXICO | 1-2 |
| 94 | AIR FORCE | 1-1 |
| 95 | TEXAS-EL PASO | 1-2 |
| 96 | NORTH TEXAS | 1-2 |
| 97 | BUFFALO | 1-1 |
| 98 | TROY | 1-2 |
| 99 | NORTHERN ILL | 2-1 |
| 100 | EAST CAROLINA | 2-1 |
| 101 | ARKANSAS STATE | 1-2 |
| 102 | IDAHO | 0-3 |
| 103 | BOWLING GREEN | 1-2 |
| 104 | SOUTH ALABAMA | 1-2 |
| 105 | FLA ATLANTIC | 1-2 |
| 106 | MARSHALL | 1-2 |
| 107 | RICE | 1-2 |
| 108 | FIU | 1-2 |
| 109 | NEW MEXICO ST | 1-2 |
| 110 | SMU | 1-2 |
| 111 | WESTERN MICH | 1-2 |
| 112 | NAVY | 0-2 |
| 113 | KENT STATE | 1-1 |
| 114 | ARMY | 0-2 |
| 115 | CENTRAL MICH | 1-1 |
| 116 | SOUTHERN MISS | 0-2 |
| 117 | UAB | 0-2 |
| 118 | EASTERN MICH | 0-3 |
| 119 | MEMPHIS | 0-3 |
| 120 | TULANE | 0-2 |
| 121 | HOUSTON | 0-3 |
| 122 | MIAMI-OHIO | 1-2 |
| 123 | AKRON | 1-2 |
| 124 | MASSACHUSETTS | 0-3 |
Cheers.
NFL Week 2 Predictions
Week 2 (11-5 SU, 9-7 ATS, 8-8 O/U)
Thursday @8:20pm
Chicago Bears at Green Bay Packers
Prediction: Packers wins 26-21
Pick: Packers -5
O/U: Under 50.5
Sunday @1pm
Tampa Bay Buccaneers at New York Giants
Prediction: Giants 24-21
Pick: Buccaneers +7.5
O/U: Over 43.5
Arizona Cardinals at New England Patriots
Prediction: Patriots wins 28-20
Pick: Cardinals +13.5
O/U: Under 48
Minnesota Vikings at Indianapolis Colts
Prediction: Colts win 23-22
Pick: Colts +1.5
O/U: Over 44
New Orleans Saints at Carolina Panthers
Prediction: Saints win 29-20
Pick: Saints -2.5
O/U: Under 50.5
Kansas City Chiefs at Buffalo Bills
Prediction: Bills win 21-20
Pick: Chiefs +3.5
O/U: Under 45
Baltimore Ravens at Philadelphia Eagles
Prediction: Ravens win 25-24
Pick: Ravens +2.5
O/U: Over 46
Oakland Raiders at Miami Dolphins
Prediction: Dolphins win 21-18
Pick: Dolphins +2.5
O/U: Over 37.5
Cleveland Browns at Cincinnati Bengals
Prediction: Cincinnati wins 18-16
Pick: Browns +9.5
O/U: Under 38.5
Houston Texans at Jacksonville Jaguars
Prediction: Texans win 25-18
Pick: Jaguars +7.5
O/U: Over 41.5
Sunday @4:05pm
Dallas Cowboys at Seattle Seahawks
Prediction: Cowboys win 24-18
Pick: Dallas -3.5
O/U: Over 41.5
Sunday @4:25pm
Washington Redskins at St. Louis Rams
Prediction: Redskins win 18-16
Pick: Rams +3.5
O/U: Under 45.5
New York Jets at Pittsburgh Steelers
Prediction: Steelers win 23-22
Pick: Jets +6.5
O/U: Over 41.5
Tennessee Titans at San Diego Chargers
Prediction: Chargers win 26-21
Pick: Titans +5.5
O/U: Over 44.5
Sunday @8:25
Detroit Lions at San Francisco 49ers
Prediction: 49ers win 22-21
Pick: Lions +6.5
O/U: Under 46.5
Monday @8:35pm
Denver Broncos at Atlanta Falcons
Prediction: Falcons win 25-20
Pick: Falcons -3.5
O/U: Under 51
Stats in the Wild 